Hi.

As I'm having some spare time ahead me, i can work on this subject, if
you're agree.

I will send you a PM, about the details.

Regards,
Filipe


2015-03-24 22:20 GMT+01:00 kyprizel <kyprizel@gmail.com>:
> Albert, this patch will not be accepted. Need to write another one, may be
> I'll try to do itlater.
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Albert Casademont
> <albertcasademont@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all, how did this end? Being considered for 1.9?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Maxim Dounin <mdounin@mdounin.ru> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 09:38:42PM +0300, kyprizel wrote:
>>>
>>> > Sure it should be tested (there are can be some memory leaks).
>>> > Need to know if it's idologically acceptable.
>>>
>>> I've provided some comments in the reply to your off-list message.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Maxim Dounin
>>> http://nginx.org/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nginx-devel mailing list
>>> nginx-devel@nginx.org
>>> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nginx-devel mailing list
>> nginx-devel@nginx.org
>> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx-devel mailing list
> nginx-devel@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel

_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel