Albert, this patch will not be accepted. Need to write another one, may be
I'll try to do itlater.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Albert Casademont <
albertcasademont@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all, how did this end? Being considered for 1.9?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Maxim Dounin <mdounin@mdounin.ru> wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 09:38:42PM +0300, kyprizel wrote:
>>
>> > Sure it should be tested (there are can be some memory leaks).
>> > Need to know if it's idologically acceptable.
>>
>> I've provided some comments in the reply to your off-list message.
>>
>> --
>> Maxim Dounin
>> http://nginx.org/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nginx-devel mailing list
>> nginx-devel@nginx.org
>> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx-devel mailing list
> nginx-devel@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
>
_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel