On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:55 PM, momyc <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote:
> You clearly... err.
>
Hmmm?
>
> > 32K simultaneous active connections to the same service on a single
> machine? I suspect the bottleneck is somewhere else...
>
> I don't know what exactly "service" means in context of our conversation
> but
> if that means server then I did not say that everything should be handled
> by
> single FastCGI server. I said single Nginx server can easily dispatch
> thousands of HTTP requests to a number of remote FastCGI backends.
>
... and I haven't seen a clue indicating that multiplexing would be as
useful in practice as
it is claimed to be in theory.
>
> > I am no among the developers at all
>
> That's what I thought.
>
Well. You must be an expert on the matter. I'll probably be enlightened
reading whatever follows.
..
:o)
Developer omniscience? I am done here.
---
*B. R.*
_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx