Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

RE: which one is better?

Glen Lumanau
April 21, 2009 07:41AM
location ~ \.php$ {
fastcgi_pass 127.0.0.1:9000;
fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME
/home/myhome/web$fastcgi_script_name;
fastcgi_index index.php;
fastcgi_cache one;
fastcgi_cache_key 127.0.0.1:9000$request_uri;
fastcgi_cache_valid 200 1h;
include /etc/nginx/fastcgi_params;
}

It seems that the /data/nginx/cache directory now have some files :D

So that the location which is go to @joomla will be cached aswell?


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nginx@sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx@sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of Igor
Sysoev
Sent: 21 April 2009 18:00
To: nginx@sysoev.ru
Subject: Re: which one is better?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:49:24PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:

> Please check http://pastebin.com/d448b8b03
>
> I've uploaded the livehttpheaders

At least

http://www.kompas-tv.com/modules/mod_smo_ajax_shoutbox_css.php

should be cacheable. Probably it is handled by not @joomla, but by
something like location ~ "\.php$".

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nginx@sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx@sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of
Igor
> Sysoev
> Sent: 21 April 2009 17:32
> To: nginx@sysoev.ru
> Subject: Re: which one is better?
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 04:02:57PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
>
> > How do i check that? Becase i'm using default configuration
>
> If you use Firefox:
> http://livehttpheaders.mozdev.org
>
> Could you create debug log ?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-nginx@sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx@sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of
> Igor
> > Sysoev
> > Sent: 21 April 2009 15:54
> > To: nginx@sysoev.ru
> > Subject: Re: which one is better?
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:44:28PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
> >
> > > I already tried this
> > >
> > > Here's the config
> > >
> > > fastcgi_cache_path /data/nginx/cache levels=1:2
keys_zone=one:10m
> > > inactive=7d max_size=200m;
> > > fastcgi_temp_path /data/nginx/temp;
> > >
> > > location @joomla {
> > > fastcgi_pass 127.0.0.1:9000;
> > > fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME
> /home/kompastv/web/index.php;
> > > fastcgi_cache one;
> > > fastcgi_cache_key
127.0.0.1:9000$request_uri;
> > > fastcgi_cache_valid 200 1h;
> > >
> > > /data/nginx/cache and /data/nginx/temp is still empty
> > >
> > > root 28119 0.0 0.0 13940 496 ? Ss 15:41 0:00
nginx:
> > > master process /etc/nginxnew/sbin/nginx -c /etc/nginx/nginx.conf
> > > nginx 28120 1.3 0.2 17328 4408 ? R 15:41 0:01
> nginx:
> > > worker process
> > > nginx 28122 1.6 0.2 17384 4540 ? S 15:41 0:01
nginx:
> > > worker process
> > > nginx 28123 0.0 0.0 14096 800 ? S 15:41 0:00
nginx:
> > > cache manager process
> > >
> > > is there somethink i've missed?
> >
> > Does fastcgi return Expires or Cache-Control headers which may forbid
> > caching ?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-nginx@sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx@sysoev.ru] On Behalf
Of
> > Igor
> > > Sysoev
> > > Sent: 21 April 2009 15:32
> > > To: nginx@sysoev.ru
> > > Subject: Re: which one is better?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:10:31PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is there any help page regarding fastcgi_cache? Or it's the same
> format
> > as
> > > > proxy_cache?
> > >
> > > Yes, just s/proxy/fastcgi/.
> > >
> > > The single difference is that fastcgi cache requires
> > >
> > > fastcgi_cache_key localhost:9000$request_uri;
> > >
> > > while proxy_cache may use default one, similar to this:
> > >
> > > proxy_cache_key $scheme$proxy_host$uri$is_args$args;
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-nginx@sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx@sysoev.ru] On Behalf
> Of
> > > Igor
> > > > Sysoev
> > > > Sent: 21 April 2009 14:41
> > > > To: nginx@sysoev.ru
> > > > Subject: Re: which one is better?
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:20:05PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I still wonder which one is better for performance
> > > > >
> > > > > Pure nginx + php-fpm
> > > > >
> > > > > Or
> > > > >
> > > > > Nginx + apache2 + proxy_cache
> > > > >
> > > > > Anybody knows about this?
> > > >
> > > > Can not say about apache2 vs php-fpm, but you can use fastcgi_cache
> too.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Igor Sysoev
> > > > http://sysoev.ru/en/
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Igor Sysoev
> > > http://sysoev.ru/en/
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Igor Sysoev
> > http://sysoev.ru/en/
> >
>
> --
> Igor Sysoev
> http://sysoev.ru/en/
>

--
Igor Sysoev
http://sysoev.ru/en/
Subject Author Posted

which one is better?

Glen Lumanau April 21, 2009 02:20AM

Re: which one is better?

Joe Bofh April 21, 2009 06:51PM

RE: which one is better?

AMP Admin April 21, 2009 07:13PM

RE: which one is better?

Glen Lumanau April 21, 2009 05:02AM

Re: which one is better?

Igor Sysoev April 21, 2009 06:32AM

RE: which one is better?

Glen Lumanau April 21, 2009 06:49AM

Re: which one is better?

Igor Sysoev April 21, 2009 06:59AM

RE: which one is better?

Glen Lumanau April 21, 2009 07:41AM

Re: which one is better?

Igor Sysoev April 21, 2009 07:49AM

Re: which one is better?

Igor Sysoev April 21, 2009 07:50AM

RE: which one is better?

Glen Lumanau April 21, 2009 06:51AM

Re: which one is better?

Igor Sysoev April 21, 2009 06:57AM

RE: which one is better?

Glen Lumanau April 21, 2009 07:38AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 235
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready