[root@mp-ws-06 nginx-0.7.52]# tail -f /var/log/nginx/error.log | grep data
2009/04/21 17:51:21 [debug] 30424#0: cache file:
"/data/nginx/cache/3/06/6fecda1e6dc4d639bbfabfe771b63063"
2009/04/21 17:51:21 [debug] 30424#0: cache file:
"/data/nginx/cache/8/00/7df93c5fa8eb0301382ec66dc9e54008"
2009/04/21 17:51:23 [debug] 30425#0: cache file:
"/data/nginx/cache/5/db/bc8df465ca5a5c053713a34370befdb5"
2009/04/21 17:51:24 [debug] 30424#0: cache file:
"/data/nginx/cache/5/db/bc8df465ca5a5c053713a34370befdb5"
2009/04/21 17:51:24 [debug] 30424#0: cache file:
"/data/nginx/cache/c/94/179da50f035455138b0ac1070c64494c"

[root@mp-ws-06 nginx-0.7.52]# cd /data/nginx/cache/
[root@mp-ws-06 cache]# ls -al
total 8
drwx------ 2 kompastv root 4096 Apr 21 15:36 .
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Apr 21 15:36 ..


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nginx@sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx@sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of Igor
Sysoev
Sent: 21 April 2009 17:32
To: nginx@sysoev.ru
Subject: Re: which one is better?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 04:02:57PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:

> How do i check that? Becase i'm using default configuration

If you use Firefox:
http://livehttpheaders.mozdev.org

Could you create debug log ?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nginx@sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx@sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of
Igor
> Sysoev
> Sent: 21 April 2009 15:54
> To: nginx@sysoev.ru
> Subject: Re: which one is better?
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:44:28PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
>
> > I already tried this
> >
> > Here's the config
> >
> > fastcgi_cache_path /data/nginx/cache levels=1:2 keys_zone=one:10m
> > inactive=7d max_size=200m;
> > fastcgi_temp_path /data/nginx/temp;
> >
> > location @joomla {
> > fastcgi_pass 127.0.0.1:9000;
> > fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME
/home/kompastv/web/index.php;
> > fastcgi_cache one;
> > fastcgi_cache_key 127.0.0.1:9000$request_uri;
> > fastcgi_cache_valid 200 1h;
> >
> > /data/nginx/cache and /data/nginx/temp is still empty
> >
> > root 28119 0.0 0.0 13940 496 ? Ss 15:41 0:00 nginx:
> > master process /etc/nginxnew/sbin/nginx -c /etc/nginx/nginx.conf
> > nginx 28120 1.3 0.2 17328 4408 ? R 15:41 0:01
nginx:
> > worker process
> > nginx 28122 1.6 0.2 17384 4540 ? S 15:41 0:01 nginx:
> > worker process
> > nginx 28123 0.0 0.0 14096 800 ? S 15:41 0:00 nginx:
> > cache manager process
> >
> > is there somethink i've missed?
>
> Does fastcgi return Expires or Cache-Control headers which may forbid
> caching ?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-nginx@sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx@sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of
> Igor
> > Sysoev
> > Sent: 21 April 2009 15:32
> > To: nginx@sysoev.ru
> > Subject: Re: which one is better?
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:10:31PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any help page regarding fastcgi_cache? Or it's the same
format
> as
> > > proxy_cache?
> >
> > Yes, just s/proxy/fastcgi/.
> >
> > The single difference is that fastcgi cache requires
> >
> > fastcgi_cache_key localhost:9000$request_uri;
> >
> > while proxy_cache may use default one, similar to this:
> >
> > proxy_cache_key $scheme$proxy_host$uri$is_args$args;
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-nginx@sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx@sysoev.ru] On Behalf
Of
> > Igor
> > > Sysoev
> > > Sent: 21 April 2009 14:41
> > > To: nginx@sysoev.ru
> > > Subject: Re: which one is better?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:20:05PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
> > >
> > > > I still wonder which one is better for performance
> > > >
> > > > Pure nginx + php-fpm
> > > >
> > > > Or
> > > >
> > > > Nginx + apache2 + proxy_cache
> > > >
> > > > Anybody knows about this?
> > >
> > > Can not say about apache2 vs php-fpm, but you can use fastcgi_cache
too.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Igor Sysoev
> > > http://sysoev.ru/en/
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Igor Sysoev
> > http://sysoev.ru/en/
> >
>
> --
> Igor Sysoev
> http://sysoev.ru/en/
>

--
Igor Sysoev
http://sysoev.ru/en/