Just to let you know, FPM is included in 5.3.3:
http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-5.php

Added FastCGI Process Manager (FPM) SAPI. (Tony)


Thanks for all the hard work that's gone into this. It's much appreciated.

http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-5.phpKind Regards,
-Mathew Davies.

I was waiting for 5.3.3 to get released any day now. much nicer than
having to tell people "5.3.3rc1+"


On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Mathew Davies
<thepixeldeveloper@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Just to let you know, FPM is included in
> 5.3.3: http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-5.php
>>
>> Added FastCGI Process Manager (FPM) SAPI. (Tony)
>
> Thanks for all the hard work that's gone into this. It's much appreciated..
> Kind Regards,
> -Mathew Davies.
>

One question, does it include a startup script? I didn't see one included.

Kind Regards,
-Mathew Davies.


On 22 July 2010 20:00, Michael Shadle <mike503@gmail.com> wrote:

> I was waiting for 5.3.3 to get released any day now. much nicer than
> having to tell people "5.3.3rc1+"
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Mathew Davies
> <thepixeldeveloper@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Just to let you know, FPM is included in
> > 5.3.3: http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-5.php
> >>
> >> Added FastCGI Process Manager (FPM) SAPI. (Tony)
> >
> > Thanks for all the hard work that's gone into this. It's much
> appreciated.
> > Kind Regards,
> > -Mathew Davies.
> >
>

2010/7/22 Mathew Davies <thepixeldeveloper@googlemail.com>:
> One question, does it include a startup script? I didn't see one included..

there is one : sapi/fpm/init.d.fpm.in which becomes
sapi/fpm/init.t.fpm after configure. It's install in ${prefix}/share
if I remember good. But it's not PHP job to provide a startup script.
As it's system dependent, the package manager is supposed to provide
it.

++ Jerome

> Kind Regards,
> -Mathew Davies.
>
>
> On 22 July 2010 20:00, Michael Shadle <mike503@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I was waiting for 5.3.3 to get released any day now. much nicer than
>> having to tell people "5.3.3rc1+"
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Mathew Davies
>> <thepixeldeveloper@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > Just to let you know, FPM is included in
>> > 5.3.3: http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-5.php
>> >>
>> >> Added FastCGI Process Manager (FPM) SAPI. (Tony)
>> >
>> > Thanks for all the hard work that's gone into this. It's much
>> > appreciated.
>> > Kind Regards,
>> > -Mathew Davies.
>> >
>
>

On 07/22/2010 03:11 PM, Mathew Davies wrote:
> Just to let you know, FPM is included in 5.3.3:

Huge thanks to all the people that worked on this!

2010/7/22 Juan Fco. Giordana <juangiordana@gmail.com>:
> On 07/22/2010 03:11 PM, Mathew Davies wrote:
>>
>> Just to let you know, FPM is included in 5.3.3:
>
> Huge thanks to all the people that worked on this!
>

Thanks you ! :)

I would love to install it but I will wait until the suhosin patch will be available for 5.3.3 and maybe ubuntu will post it in their repositories.

http://VladGh.com

On Jul 23, 9:58 am, "nofun" <nginx-fo...@nginx.us> wrote:

> I would love to install it but I will wait until the suhosin patch will
> be available for 5.3.3 and maybe ubuntu will post it in their
> repositories.

i am using dotdeb php-fpm 5.3.3 with suhosin and xcache patch in
ubuntu hardy server now (updated yesterday), works great.

-
Yonsy Solis

Doing some tests I compiled from sources php 5.3.3 with the new suhosin patch and latest apc. It works great and I discovered something: the memory consumption is lower (including the committed memory) even though the compiled modules are the same as those installed through apt. Can someone explain this? Is there a difference between the loading of libraries in an apt install versus a manual compilation of the sources?

http://VladGh.com

I have migrate from php 5.2.12 to 5.3.3

The fpm of 5.3.3 is far superior than patch for 5.2.12. Most of application
could be transfered without changes.



On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:32 AM, nofun <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote:

> Doing some tests I compiled from sources php 5.3.3 with the new suhosin
> patch and latest apc. It works great and I discovered something: the
> memory consumption is lower (including the committed memory) even though
> the compiled modules are the same as those installed through apt. Can
> someone explain this? Is there a difference between the loading of
> libraries in an apt install versus a manual compilation of the sources?
>
> Posted at Nginx Forum:
> http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?3,111735,112837#msg-112837
>