Maxim Dounin
August 31, 2019 02:36PM
Hello!

On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:43:40PM -0700, Thibault Charbonnier wrote:

> # HG changeset patch
> # User Thibault Charbonnier <thibaultcha@me.com>
> # Date 1567193727 25200
> # Fri Aug 30 12:35:27 2019 -0700
> # Node ID 40abd582aafbd22c2435afed5fd3311333ca99bd
> # Parent a31ec2b79f9f208fecbc92020d12edb2a5207480
> Upstream keepalive: keepalive_pool_key directive.
>
> This directive gives control to the user as to how they wish upstream
> connection pools be created and used.
>
> By default, each upstream block maintains a unique connection pool per
> IP/port tuple specified via the `server` directive.
>
> With this change, if the `keepalive_pool_key` directive is specified in
> an upstream block, the connection pools will be further segmented
> according to the IP/port/pool_key combination. Each connection pool will
> still have up to as many connections as specified in the `keepalive`
> directive.
>
> * When `keepalive_pool_key` evaluates to an empty string, the pool_key
> behavior is disabled (as if only `keepalive` was specified).
> * When the pool_key behavior is in effect, SSL session reuse will be
> disabled out of the box (as if `proxy_ssl_session_reuse off;` was
> specified).
> * Two new variables `$keepalive_pool_key` and `$keepalive_pool_key_raw`
> can be accessed to read the value of the current pool_key (if set).
> The former will compile the value, while the later will return it as
> specified by the user.
>
> This solves existing limitations of the upstream block such as
> detailed in the following tickets:
>
> * https://trac.nginx.org/nginx/ticket/1340
> * https://trac.nginx.org/nginx/ticket/1593
>
> For example, let's consider a use-case similar to #1340, in which
> different SNIs are intended to open different connections:
>
> upstream upstream.domain.com {
> server 1.1.1.1:443;
>
> keepalive 60;
> keepalive_pool_key $upstream_sni;
> }

[...]

No, thank you. The issues as observed in the tickets linked
should be resolved by using distinct upstream blocks instead.

--
Maxim Dounin
http://mdounin.ru/
_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
Subject Author Views Posted

[PATCH] Upstream keepalive: keepalive_pool_key directive.

Thibault Charbonnier 80 August 30, 2019 03:44PM

Re: [PATCH] Upstream keepalive: keepalive_pool_key directive.

Maxim Dounin 35 August 31, 2019 02:36PM



Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 94
Record Number of Users: 6 on February 13, 2018
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready