Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Error handling from filter modules

October 16, 2015 01:16PM
On 16/10/2015 13:20, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 02:36:13AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
>> I'm making changes to a filter module and when it detected an error it
>> returned NGX_ERROR however the response generated to the client isn't
>> the expected 500 internal server error I would have expected given said
>> return.
>>
>> So the question is do filters have to manually call
>> ngx_http_finalize_request(r, NGX_HTTP_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR); or is it
>> expected that the upper layers should actually do the right thing and
>> ensure the client doesn't get a bad response generated from the current
>> state of r with no indication an error occurred?
> In filters, it's already to late to return anything in case of
> errors. In body filters, it's way too late - the response was
> already partially sent. And in header filters there is a chance that
> other filters allocated something response-specific, and an
> attempt to return a different response will break things. So,
> when you return NGX_ERROR from a filter, the connection is just
> closed.
There are a few core filters which seem to contradict this;

range does:
return ngx_http_range_not_satisfiable(r, ctx);

while image does:
return ngx_http_filter_finalize_request(r,
&ngx_http_image_filter_module,
NGX_HTTP_UNSUPPORTED_MEDIA_TYPE);

The range filter is the one I was looking at, picking back up the work
you gave feedback on a while back with regards allow partial content
responses to be used to satisfy range requests.

During testing for failures I triggered the NGX_ERROR case here:
https://github.com/nginx/nginx/blob/master/src/http/modules/ngx_http_range_filter_module.c#L233

When I triggered this case client recieved an broken 200 response, where
as if I did finalise the request I could deliver a 500 response, so was
wondering if this would be correct in this situation?
> If you absolutely must return an error from a filter - like, e.g.,
> not modified filter do for 416 responses - there is a special
> function to do this, ngx_http_filter_finalize_request(). It's
> very fragile though, and I wouldn't recommend using it unless you
> are sure you must do it.
Yer I found that later but seems my mail's been playing up today, so
sorry for the crossed replies.

Thanks for the feedback :)

Regards
Steve

_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
Subject Author Views Posted

Error handling from filter modules

steveh 696 October 15, 2015 09:38PM

Re: Error handling from filter modules

Roman Arutyunyan 317 October 16, 2015 08:18AM

Re: Error handling from filter modules

Maxim Dounin 296 October 16, 2015 08:24AM

Re: Error handling from filter modules

Roman Arutyunyan 317 October 16, 2015 02:18PM

Re: Error handling from filter modules

Maxim Dounin 313 October 16, 2015 08:22AM

Re: Error handling from filter modules

steveh 411 October 16, 2015 01:16PM

Re: Error handling from filter modules

Maxim Dounin 295 October 19, 2015 01:00PM

Re: Error handling from filter modules

steveh 397 October 19, 2015 06:04PM

Re: Error handling from filter modules

Maxim Dounin 312 October 19, 2015 10:02PM

Re: Error handling from filter modules

steveh 412 October 16, 2015 12:50PM



Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 154
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready