Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Patch for s390x support

Maxim Dounin
October 14, 2015 12:28PM
Hello!

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 01:22:58PM +0000, Neale Ferguson wrote:

> Thanks. I have the non-builtin version of the atomic operations written
> for s390x, so on the off chance if someone wants to build using gcc < 4.1
> then things will build/run. However, given then low probability of that is
> it worth submitting the patch?

No. The s390x platform certainly isn't that popular to justify an
in-house atomic operations implementation. In case someone wants
to use a compiler without builtin atomic operations, the libatomic
library can be used (or nginx can be used without atomic
operations at all).

I would rather like to see C11 atomics support added - they aren't
currently supported by nginx.

--
Maxim Dounin
http://nginx.org/

_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
Subject Author Views Posted

Patch for s390x support

Neale Ferguson 491 October 12, 2015 01:24PM

Re: Patch for s390x support

Maxim Dounin 216 October 13, 2015 08:46AM

Re: Patch for s390x support

Neale Ferguson 200 October 13, 2015 09:30AM

Re: Patch for s390x support

Maxim Dounin 230 October 14, 2015 12:28PM

Re: Patch for s390x support

Neale Ferguson 231 October 14, 2015 12:36PM



Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 200
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready