We use 206 cached responses.

On 23/11/2014 11:45, Piotr Sikora wrote:
> Hey Maxim,
>
>> For example, it can be usable with 206 responses as well (and this
>> is perfectly allowed by the RFC).
> 206 responses won't be cached by nginx, so that's kind of a moot point.
>
>> I still think this approach is wrong, the behaviour shouldn't
>> depend on the status code.
> Why not? How else do you want to fix this problem?
>
> I really don't understand why do you disagree, because it's pretty
> clear to me that it MUST depend on the status code... What more
> convincing do you need?
>
> Best regards,
> Piotr Sikora
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx-devel mailing list
> nginx-devel@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel

_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel