Hello!

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 01:57:32PM -0800, Piotr Sikora wrote:

> Hey Maxim,
>
> > Or which one to ignore, if something in it looks wrong/suspicious.
> > I'm just trying to say that blindly following an RFC isn't a good
> > rationale for a commit.
>
> Yeah, but not following and/or doing exactly the opposite (like in
> this case) without good reason just leads to edge cases and
> interoperability issues.

That's exactly the reason why I don't want to change this without
a good reason (and an explanation why the change was done in
RFC7232). Current behaviour is one required by RFC2616.
Difference with the behaviour required by RFC7232 at most can
result in suboptimal operation. Nothing really bad can happen.

--
Maxim Dounin
http://nginx.org/

_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel