Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: [PATCH] SSL: add "{proxy, uwsgi}_ssl_verify" and supporting directives

Piotr Sikora
February 06, 2014 05:40PM
Hey Maxim,

> Nitpicking:
>
> It may be better to write about "proxy_..." directives, and
> mention uwsgi counterparts separately and/or introduce them in a
> separate patch. Cryptic names to mention all the modules aren't
> very readable and hardly searchable, so we generally try to avoid
> them now.

Will do.

> I don't really like this approach of a special "server_name" value
> and SNI dependency, it looks counterintuitive. Peer name
> verification should be done by default, and probably there should
> be a separate option to turn it off if needed for some reason.
>
> I believe the main reason for SNI dependency is a name to verify
> against. In case of proxy, shouldn't it be $proxy_host by
> default?

I strongly disagree with you on that. IMHO, peer has no obligation to
deliver certificate matching hostname if we don't ask for it using SNI
and therefore we can't complain if it doesn't match.

> Something like this:
>
> proxy_ssl_verify on;
> proxy_ssl_name $proxy_host;
>
> or this:
>
> proxy_ssl_verify on;
> proxy_ssl_verify_name off;
>
> And the same name probably may be used for SNI, with an
> additional flag to switch it on, like this:
>
> proxy_ssl_sni on;
> proxy_ssl_name $proxy_host;
>
> (Well, it might be better to introduce something more generic to
> also resolve default proxy_cache_key vs. "proxy_set_header Host"
> issue, but I don't see any obvious solution yet.)
>
> What do you think?

What about defaults being:

proxy_ssl_verify on;
proxy_ssl_server_name $proxy_host;

where "proxy_ssl_verify on" automatically checks server name if
supported (basically, merging "server_name" and "on" from my patch)?

> Not sure if it's needed at all. I think we can safely assume that
> verification options are the same in all cases.

I'd rather be safe and do one more comparison than allow server block
with proxy SSL verification to reuse connection established by a
server block without it.

Best regards,
Piotr Sikora

_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
Subject Author Views Posted

[PATCH] SSL: add "{proxy, uwsgi}_ssl_verify" and supporting directives

Piotr Sikora 1149 February 04, 2014 09:32PM

[PATCH] SSL: add "{proxy, uwsgi}_ssl_verify" and supporting directives

Piotr Sikora 419 February 05, 2014 01:56AM

Re: [PATCH] SSL: add "{proxy, uwsgi}_ssl_verify" and supporting directives

Maxim Dounin 400 February 06, 2014 11:12AM

Re: [PATCH] SSL: add "{proxy, uwsgi}_ssl_verify" and supporting directives

Piotr Sikora 404 February 06, 2014 05:40PM

Re: [PATCH] SSL: add "{proxy, uwsgi}_ssl_verify" and supporting directives

Maxim Dounin 371 February 06, 2014 07:04PM

Re: [PATCH] SSL: add "{proxy, uwsgi}_ssl_verify" and supporting directives

Piotr Sikora 404 February 06, 2014 09:42PM

Re: [PATCH] SSL: add "{proxy, uwsgi}_ssl_verify" and supporting directives

Maxim Dounin 456 February 07, 2014 06:00AM

Re: [PATCH] SSL: add "{proxy, uwsgi}_ssl_verify" and supporting directives

Piotr Sikora 456 February 11, 2014 04:18PM

Re: [PATCH] SSL: add "{proxy, uwsgi}_ssl_verify" and supporting directives

Maxim Dounin 402 February 12, 2014 11:30AM

Re: [PATCH] SSL: add "{proxy, uwsgi}_ssl_verify" and supporting directives

Valentin V. Bartenev 401 February 12, 2014 01:44PM

Re: [PATCH] SSL: add "{proxy, uwsgi}_ssl_verify" and supporting directives

Maxim Dounin 486 April 18, 2014 12:54PM

Re: [PATCH] SSL: add "{proxy, uwsgi}_ssl_verify" and supporting directives

Piotr Sikora 650 April 22, 2014 08:02AM



Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 170
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready