Hello!

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:16:48PM -0700, Piotr Sikora wrote:

> Hey Maxim,
>
> > Ok, fair enough. Wouldn't something like this be better then
> > (untested)?
>
> It would, originally I had pretty much the same patch, but for some
> reason I thought you'd like the one I send better.
>
> Tested and works fine.
>
> > --- a/src/os/unix/ngx_errno.h
> > +++ b/src/os/unix/ngx_errno.h
> > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ typedef int ngx_err_t;
> > #define NGX_ENOMOREFILES 0
> > #define NGX_ELOOP ELOOP
> > #define NGX_EBADF EBADF
> > +#define NGX_EOPNOTSUPP EOPNOTSUPP
>
> Just a nitpick, but I believe that NGX_EOPNOTSUPP should be added
> between NGX_EINPROGRESS & NGX_EADDRINUSE, to keep the order the same
> as in system's errno.h.

Sure, fixed (and added win32 define for completeness). Committed,
thanks.

--
Maxim Dounin
http://nginx.org/en/donation.html

_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel