Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Why named shared memory zones

Marcus Clyne
September 28, 2009 01:00PM
Igor Sysoev wrote:
> In my opinion
>
> proxy_cache_path /data/nginx/cache levels=1:2 keys_zone=ONE:10m
> inactive=1h max_size=1g;
>
> is clearer and more expansible: you just need to add new keywords.
>
I see your point, I just personally prefer the shorter syntax, and if
you are familiar with the syntax, I think it's quicker to read

proxy_cache_path /data/nginx/cache 1:2 ONE 10m 1h 1g;

How about offering both? You could have a syntax that included the
key/value pairs and one that had the shorter syntax with a specific
ordering. That would mean that admins could choose the version they prefer.

Just an idea.

Thanks,

Marcus.
Subject Author Posted

Why named shared memory zones

Marcus Clyne September 28, 2009 08:32AM

Re: Why named shared memory zones

Igor Sysoev September 28, 2009 08:52AM

Re: Why named shared memory zones

Marcus Clyne September 28, 2009 11:34AM

Re: Why named shared memory zones

Igor Sysoev September 28, 2009 11:44AM

Re: Why named shared memory zones

Marcus Clyne September 28, 2009 12:08PM

Re: Why named shared memory zones

Igor Sysoev September 28, 2009 12:20PM

Re: Why named shared memory zones

Marcus Clyne September 28, 2009 01:00PM

Re: Why named shared memory zones

Igor Sysoev September 28, 2009 03:36PM

Re: Why named shared memory zones

Marcus Clyne September 28, 2009 04:48PM

Re: Why named shared memory zones

Maxim Dounin September 28, 2009 07:32PM

Re: Why named shared memory zones

Marcus Clyne September 28, 2009 08:10PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 129
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready