Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: using the upstream_hash_module and handling changes when adding new servers

April 07, 2009 03:32PM
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 11:16 -0700, Michael Shadle wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Cliff Wells <cliff@develix.com> wrote:
>
> > I'd suggest looking into one of the clustered filesystems such as GFS or
> > Lustre, although that might be more difficult to deploy on an existing
> > infrastructure.
>
> those require exported filesystems (iscsi, fake iscsi, SANs, etc) and
> can be a pain in the ass to manage.

Technically block devices, but yes. I'd suggest trying a supported
distro such as RHEL/CentOS which ships with this stuff and includes some
nice management tools. Of course, this comes back to what I said
earlier about being difficult to deploy on an existing infrastructure.

Regards,
Cliff
Subject Author Posted

using the upstream_hash_module and handling changes when adding new servers

jackdempsey April 07, 2009 11:44AM

RE: using the upstream_hash_module and handling changes when adding new servers

lbates35406 April 07, 2009 12:17PM

Re: using the upstream_hash_module and handling changes when adding new servers

mike April 07, 2009 01:18PM

Re: using the upstream_hash_module and handling changes when adding new servers

jackdempsey April 07, 2009 01:54PM

Re: using the upstream_hash_module and handling changes when adding new servers

Cliff Wells April 07, 2009 01:59PM

Re: using the upstream_hash_module and handling changes when adding new servers

mike April 07, 2009 02:16PM

Re: using the upstream_hash_module and handling changes when adding new servers

Cliff Wells April 07, 2009 03:32PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 81
Record Number of Users: 6 on February 13, 2018
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready