Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: _upstream_max_fails and _upstream_fail_timeout directives

Oleksandr V. Typlyns'kyi
May 19, 2010 05:36PM
Yesterday May 19, 2010 at 23:17 Manlio Perillo wrote:

> > *) Feature: the "server" directive in the "upstream" context supports
> > the "max_fails", "fail_timeout", and "down" parameters.
> >
> > They conflicted.
> >
>
> What I meant was: "why the directives are still defined in the source
> code for the proxy, fastcgi and memcached modules".
>
> If they are no more supported, I'm not sure to understand why they are
> still defined (and just raise an error message).

http://wiki.nginx.org/NginxHttpUpstreamModule#server
*_upstream_max_fails -> max_fails
*_upstream_fail_timeout -> fail_timeout

--
WNGS-RIPE

_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Subject Author Posted

_upstream_max_fails and _upstream_fail_timeout directives

Manlio Perillo May 19, 2010 07:20AM

Re: _upstream_max_fails and _upstream_fail_timeout directives

Igor Sysoev May 19, 2010 08:34AM

Re: _upstream_max_fails and _upstream_fail_timeout directives

Manlio Perillo May 19, 2010 05:22PM

Re: _upstream_max_fails and _upstream_fail_timeout directives

Oleksandr V. Typlyns'kyi May 19, 2010 05:36PM

Re: _upstream_max_fails and _upstream_fail_timeout directives

Igor Sysoev May 20, 2010 01:12AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 184
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready