----- Markus Jelsma <markus@buyways.nl> wrote:
> Sounds good!
>
>
> But Valery, i previously used your new eval module that allows for multiple
> blocks. That version had an issue with not letting memc_pass close the
> memcached connection when setting values (getting values worked properly).
>
> Now, for the moment, i use agentzh's eval which for some reason also allows
> for multiple eval blocks and does let memc_pass close the connection.
>
> I'd prefer to use your release if a fix could be made that closes the
> connection with the memcache server.

I'll try to fix this problem.

>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
> >I appreciate your interest in my software, but the problem with this
> > contributed code at the moment is that it is not as efficient as it could
> > possibly be and it is not universal enough.
> >
> >In particular I don't like the presence of "eval_subrequest_in_memory"
> > directive at all, because it specifies which way of internal communication
> > the module needs to use, which doesn't make any sense for end user.
> >
> >Second, the contributed code allocates a buffer and uses it in order to
> > assemble the output of subrequest in it. This allocation can be totally
> > avoided, if an appropriate state machine is implemented.
> >
> >As soon as these issues are resolved, I'll accept this code.
>
> Markus Jelsma - Technisch Architect - Buyways BV
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
> 050-8536620 / 06-50258350
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

--
--
Regards,
Valery Kholodkov

_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx