Piotr Sikora
February 10, 2010 12:34PM
> Shouldn't NFS be caching already?

Should it? It's remote location which can be modified by other systems.

> Given you have free ram available on the
> nginx machine, it should be caching the files in disk cache. Why the
> redundancy?

Well, for one, free local disk space is probably order of magnitude bigger
than buffer cache.

Best regards,
Piotr Sikora < piotr.sikora@frickle.com >


_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Subject Author Posted

Nginx, static files and local caching

rkappert February 10, 2010 04:20AM

Re: Nginx, static files and local caching

Jérôme Loyet February 10, 2010 05:00AM

Re: Nginx, static files and local caching

Piotr Sikora February 10, 2010 10:18AM

Re: Nginx, static files and local caching

Chris Zimmerman February 10, 2010 11:06AM

Re: Nginx, static files and local caching

Piotr Sikora February 10, 2010 12:34PM

Re: Nginx, static files and local caching

Chris Zimmerman February 10, 2010 04:04PM

Re: Nginx, static files and local caching

Piotr Sikora February 10, 2010 04:22PM

RE: Nginx, static files and local caching

Glen Lumanau February 11, 2010 01:00AM

Re: Nginx, static files and local caching

Piotr Sikora February 11, 2010 10:26AM

RE: Nginx, static files and local caching

Glen Lumanau February 11, 2010 11:02PM

RE: Nginx, static files and local caching

Glen Lumanau February 11, 2010 11:12PM

Re: Nginx, static files and local caching

Piotr Sikora February 12, 2010 12:16AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 176
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 500 on July 15, 2024
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready