Something to take into account: if you limit the bandwidth,
a nginx worker will have to spend more time for that request,
time he cannot spend on other, possibly more meaningful
requests.

> On 24 Dec 2021, at 14:23, Francis Daly <francis@daoine.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 09:53:26AM +0800, huiming wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
>> Any suggestion for third-party module that does some form of internal bandwidth limiting?
>
> Noting that I imagine that if this facility were straightforward
> to implement efficiently and reliably in a future-proof fashion,
> it would already be included in a stock nginx module; I can
> see that a web search for some likely-looking terms points at
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fvozlt%2Fnginx-module-vts&amp;data=04%7C01%7CNicolas.Franck%40ugent.be%7Cf8ccb3df1ea8452a46bf08d9c6e0a02d%7Cd7811cdeecef496c8f91a1786241b99c%7C1%7C0%7C637759490768086551%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=S61bxGKoqFHttBvuP3nl5YAaGBJkJyVMmvBr96R699I%3D&amp;reserved=0 as maybe being interesting.
>
> (But I'm not sure if that limits the total transfer, or the transfer
> rate. You'll want to test if it does the thing that you want, and if
> the limitations are acceptable to you.)
>
> Good luck with it,
>
> f
> --
> Francis Daly francis@daoine.org
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmailman.nginx.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnginx&amp;data=04%7C01%7CNicolas.Franck%40ugent.be%7Cf8ccb3df1ea8452a46bf08d9c6e0a02d%7Cd7811cdeecef496c8f91a1786241b99c%7C1%7C0%7C637759490768086551%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=VTsIXXzZRvtaPGQ%2Fp42Dv8DCM%2FBB8dABBBPcbpx03VI%3D&amp;reserved=0

_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx