Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Why set keepalive_timeout to a short period when Nginx is great at handling them?

Aahan Krish
June 19, 2016 10:48AM
Ah, I didn't know about NAT before. So that's how we have shared IP
addresses vs. dedicated IP addresses. This is beautiful; there's so
much to learn.

So the 2^16 limitation that B.R. mentioned is nothing to worry about.
It's like worrying that there are limited IP addresses available so we
can't serve infinite number of users, heh.

Thank you very much B.R. and Valentin for answering my questions. Have
a great day!

_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Subject Author Posted

Why set keepalive_timeout to a short period when Nginx is great at handling them?

Aahan Krish June 18, 2016 07:28AM

Re: Why set keepalive_timeout to a short period when Nginx is great at handling them?

B.R. June 18, 2016 08:14AM

Re: Why set keepalive_timeout to a short period when Nginx is great at handling them?

Aahan Krish June 18, 2016 11:30AM

Re: Why set keepalive_timeout to a short period when Nginx is great at handling them?

Valentin V. Bartenev June 19, 2016 04:54AM

Re: Why set keepalive_timeout to a short period when Nginx is great at handling them?

Aahan Krish June 19, 2016 06:56AM

Re: Why set keepalive_timeout to a short period when Nginx is great at handling them?

Valentin V. Bartenev June 19, 2016 09:46AM

Re: Why set keepalive_timeout to a short period when Nginx is great at handling them?

Aahan Krish June 19, 2016 10:48AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 277
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready