-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:55:40 +0300
> Von: Igor Sysoev <igor@sysoev.ru>
> An: nginx@nginx.org
> Betreff: Re: nginx-0.8.29

> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 03:51:40PM +0100, Steve wrote:
>
> >
> > -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > > Datum: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:32:41 +0300
> > > Von: Igor Sysoev <igor@sysoev.ru>
> > > An: nginx@nginx.org
> > > Betreff: Re: nginx-0.8.29
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 02:55:00PM +0100, Steve wrote:
> > >
> > > > > *) Feature: the --with-libatomic[=DIR] option in the
> configure.
> > > > > Thanks to W-Mark Kubacki.
> > > > >
> > > > What is this libatomic? Is it this here ->
> > > http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/atomic_ops/
> > >
> > > Yes.
> > >
> > Is that needed if one is using GCC >= 4.1? Or is this already used (in
> some way) by this here:
> > > *) Feature: GCC 4.1+ built-in atomic operations usage.
> > > Thanks to W-Mark Kubacki.
>
> If GCC supports atomic operations, then nginx uses them. Otherwise, it
> uses
> own atomic operations for i386, amd64, sparc32/64, ppc32/64.
>
> You may force to use libatomic, if you do not like GCC atomic operations.
>
Okay. I understand. Is there any benefit using libatomic?


>
> --
> Igor Sysoev
> http://sysoev.ru/en/
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

--
Preisknaller: GMX DSL Flatrate für nur 16,99 Euro/mtl.!
http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02

_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx