xD Maxim.

I would have put 'hopefully' along with 'surprisingly' though... just to
convince myself such dumbness is marginal.

To lists@lazygranch.com, nginx version can already be removed with the help
of the server_tokens
<http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_core_module.html#server_tokens>
directive.
Why that is not the default brings back the eternal difficulties around
changing defaults, compatbility and stability, debate I (re)initiated
around some other 'odd' defaults.

Anyway, we are drifting away from the original subject, which is... Oh
yeah, stupidity. And next to his lawyer. (And huge font size.)
---
*B. R.*

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Maxim Konovalov <maxim@nginx.com> wrote:

> On 6/3/16 7:33 AM, lists@lazygranch.com wrote:
> > Perhaps in a future release of Nginx, the error pages should not
> > contain any reference to nginx. That is the only way I can figure
> > out this person came up with the idea of complaining to the list.
> > (Assuming this isn't spam to encourage use to click on that website
> > link.)
> >
> Actually, a number of such complains is still surprisingly low.
>
> > I think another mistake is to have the error page indicate the rev
> > of nginx. That is an easy way for someone to spot a vulnerable rev
> > of the nginx on a server.
> >
>
> --
> Maxim Konovalov
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx