Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: HTTP/2 roadmap

B.R.
March 12, 2016 10:38AM
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Phil Lello <phil@dunlop-lello.uk> wrote:

>
> Given that the current state of HTTP/2 support in browsers seems to be
> forcing the use of TLS, it seems that the opportunity for proxies to kick
> in is relatively limited.
>

​Why could not proxies​

​be used with HTTP/2? Why would you expect the existing one to suddenly be
removed?​

> A secondary requirement is a mechanism to implement server-push, so that
>> > <language-of-choice> can specify page dependencies, rather than
>> requiring
>> > inspection of content within the server.
>> >
>> > Is any work currently being done in this direction?
>>
>> No.
>>
>
> OK. So the question now becomes, if I start work in these areas, is it
> likely to be rejected by core, or is it simply that no one else has had the
> time and motivation?
>

Whatever others' stance on that matter, you could always prepare some
module of your own and make it publicly available. If nginx rejects your
work for whatever reasons, people would still be able to use it in their
setup.
---
*B. R.*
_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Subject Author Posted

HTTP/2 roadmap

Phil Lello March 11, 2016 09:42AM

Re: HTTP/2 roadmap

Maxim Dounin March 11, 2016 11:00AM

Re: HTTP/2 roadmap

Phil Lello March 12, 2016 08:10AM

Re: HTTP/2 roadmap

B.R. March 12, 2016 10:38AM

Re: HTTP/2 roadmap

Maxim Dounin March 13, 2016 06:24PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 228
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready