Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Sticky equivalent

B.R.
June 20, 2014 01:12AM
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Aleksandar Lazic <al-nginx@none.at> wrote:

>
> Am 18-06-2014 20:46, schrieb Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu:
>
>> Oh god 1350$
>>
>
> Per year.
>
> It's cheap compared to some other commercial Servers, from my point of
> view.
>

​... and it is expensive compared to the open-source Apache.​


​nginx as FOSS is great.
nginx Plus is worth as much as other commercial/closed-source products.​..

Well.
The 'sticky' property is out of scope of this ML since not part of the FOSS
nginx.
End of discussion.

The docs are already polluted with mentions of the commercial product
since, surprisingly, nginx Plus docs have not been separated from nginx
FOSS ones. On a personal stance, I would like not to see this ML polluted
with discussions on nginx Plus.

---
*B. R.*
_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Subject Author Posted

Sticky equivalent

Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu June 18, 2014 06:26AM

Re: Sticky equivalent

Ruslan Ermilov June 18, 2014 07:00AM

Re: Sticky equivalent

Fabiano Furtado Pessoa Coelho June 18, 2014 10:24AM

Re: Sticky equivalent

Ruslan Ermilov June 18, 2014 10:50AM

Re: Sticky equivalent

Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu June 18, 2014 02:48PM

Re: Sticky equivalent

Ruslan Ermilov June 18, 2014 05:10PM

Re: Sticky equivalent

Aleksandar Lazic June 19, 2014 03:48AM

Re: Sticky equivalent

B.R. June 20, 2014 01:12AM

Re: Sticky equivalent

Aleksandar Lazic June 20, 2014 08:08AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 108
Record Number of Users: 6 on February 13, 2018
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready