On 3/28/2014 1:58 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Nobody care enough to submit a patch.
> Likely due to the fact that SNI isn't considered to be an option
> for serious SSL-enabled sites anyway due to still limited
> client-side support, see here for details:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication#Client_side

Makes sense! And I can live with the SSL warning that results when I
employ the method I described a few posts back.

Thanks again for your help, everyone!

-Ben

_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx