Hi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nginx-bounces@nginx.org [mailto:nginx-bounces@nginx.org] On
> Behalf Of Jérôme Loyet
> Sent: Friday, 26 October 2012 3:35 AM
> To: nginx@nginx.org
> Subject: Re: AJP
>
> 2012/10/25 rmalayter <nginx-forum@nginx.us>:
> > Jérôme Loyet Wrote:
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> >> We were in the same situation and didn't want to take the risk to use
> >> a third party module, so we switched to HTTP and it's just perfect.
> >>
> >> my 2 cents ;)
> >
> > We did the same here. Now that nginx does keep-alives to the
> > back-ends, there's really no advantage to using AJP between the web
> server and Tomcat.
> >
> >
> > In fact, our internal load testing showed nginx->HTTP->Tomcat
> > performing marginally better than Apache->AJP->Tomcat with Tomcat
> > serving a simple test JSP.
>
> Same results here. In fact the way nginx works (async) compensate the loss
> due to switching to HTTP (and even more than expected).

Okay I have enough reason to try out http.

Still my question though how did you deal with stickiness?

[snip]


Alex

_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx