Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re:Re: Re: 2 questions on send_timeout (maybe bugs)

Wu Bingzheng
May 20, 2011 12:00AM
Hi Maxim,

1.
I am so sorry that I made a big mistake on question 1.
Nginx didn't detect the downstream breaking, because I use "proxy_ignore_client_abort on;".
So Nginx works correctlly. I am so sorry about it.


2.
For question 2.
You said that :
>Note also that in debug log you provided nginx correctly times out
>after 20s from last send.

That's because I set the send_timeout as 10s. I am sorry that I did not make clear of that.


You can reproduce the doubled timeout easy:

[server] using nginx-1.0.0, without any addon module. in nginx.conf:

server {
listen 5821;
proxy_buffering off; #must in non-buffering mode
send_timeout 10;

location / {
proxy_pass http://sourceserver;
}
}



[client] you can run this simple python script:

#!/usr/bin/python
import socket
import time
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET,socket.SOCK_STREAM)
s.connect((127.0.0.1, 5821))
s.send("GET /data/something HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n")
buf = s.recv(100)
print buf
time.sleep(100)



Then, in access.log, you will find that the request is finished in 20s.


Best Regads,
Wu








At 2011-05-19 19:38:42,"Maxim Dounin" <mdounin@mdounin.ru> wrote:

>Hello!
>
>On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:39:43AM +0800, Wu Bingzheng wrote:
>
>> Hi Maxim,
>>
>> Thanks for your answer. But I am still confused.
>>
>>
>> At 2011-05-18 21:35:07,"Maxim Dounin" <mdounin@mdounin.ru> wrote:
>>
>> >Hello!
>> >
>> >On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 05:15:00PM +0800, Wu Bingzheng wrote:
>> >
>> >> hi all,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I meet 2 question when using nginx 1.0.0.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Question1.
>> >>
>> >> what happens if the downstream connection breaks, before all
>> >> data sent to the client?
>> >>
>> >> 1. get client's request
>> >> 2. set handler: r->read_event_handle=ngx_http_block_reading
>> >> 3. send data to client, and blocked (
>> >> write_filter.c:c->send_chain() returns non-NULL or non-error),
>> >> and go back to epoll_wait
>> >> 4. HERE, the downstream breaks
>> >> 5. epoll detect the breaking, so epoll_wait() continues in
>> >> ngx_epoll_process_events(), where the revents==EPOLL_IN |
>> >> EPOLL_ERR | EPOLL_HUP. So we call rev->handler(), which calls
>> >> r->read_event_handle, which dose nothing. AS A RESULT, the
>> >> downstream breaking was not detected by nginx !!!
>> >
>> >Here write event handler will be called. While standard
>> >ngx_http_writer() is in use - it will call output filter chain and
>> >detect error. Else it's up to active handler to correctly handle
>> >this, e.g. standard upstream modules (proxy/fastcgi/...) may
>> >either terminate request immediately or wait for full upstream
>> >response depending on various settings (proxy_ignore_client_abort,
>> >proxy_cache/proxy_store enabled).
>> >
>>
>> You said the write handler will be called. But if a connection
>> is break, revents returned by epoll_wait() is 'EPOLL_IN |
>> EPOLL_ERR | EPOLL_HUP', and no EPOLL_OUT in revents. So I think
>> the write-handler will NOT be called.
>
>Ah, ok, it looks like I was wrong here. Write handler will be
>only called if there are no EPOLLIN flag in revents, and this is
>probably wrong assuming EPOLLHUP follows the same semantics as
>POLLHUP[1], i.e.
>
>POLLHUP
>... This event and POLLOUT are mutually-exclusive; a stream can
>never be writable if a hangup has occurred. ...
>
>Could you please provide detailed instructions to reproduce the
>problem, preferably with standard modules involved?
>
>[1] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/poll.html
>
>> The FACT is, in my server, there are many many access logs whose
>> time-taken are 40.001s. (send_timeout is 20s, and this is a
>> music online server, so many people re-choose a song before the
>> current song finishs, which means the downstream breaks before
>> nginx sends all data).
>>
>> I add 2 debug log in ngx_epoll_process_events(), and copy part
>> of the debug log here.
>
>Just a side note: mostly same information may be seen at global
>level debug log.
>
>[...]
>
>> >> I set 'send_timeout' as 20s, but nginx timeouts in 40s actually.
>> >>
>> >> 1. in
>> >> src/http/ngx_http_upstream.c[line2448]:ngx_http_upstream_process_non_buffered_request(),
>> >> a timer is added;
>> >> 2. after that timer timeout, in
>> >> src/http/ngx_http_request.c[line2179]:ngx_http_set_write_handler(),
>> >> another timer is added again.
>> >>
>> >> so the send_timeout is doubled.
>> >
>> >Timeout is re-set on each send operation, and expected to be
>> >triggered when nothing happens during send_timeout.
>>
>> So, you think that, I set 'send_timeout' as 20s, but nginx
>> actually timeout in 40s is right and expected?
>
>It should timeout in 20s after last send. Whether request time
>of 40s is wrong or not depends on many factors, but the code you
>pointed out looks fine.
>
>Note also that in debug log you provided nginx correctly times out
>after 20s from last send.
>
>Maxim Dounin


_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Subject Author Posted

2 questions on send_timeout (maybe bugs)

Wu Bingzheng May 18, 2011 05:16AM

Re: 2 questions on send_timeout (maybe bugs)

Maxim Dounin May 18, 2011 09:36AM

Re:Re: 2 questions on send_timeout (maybe bugs)

Wu Bingzheng May 18, 2011 10:42PM

Re: Re: 2 questions on send_timeout (maybe bugs)

Maxim Dounin May 19, 2011 07:40AM

Re:Re: Re: 2 questions on send_timeout (maybe bugs)

Wu Bingzheng May 20, 2011 12:00AM

Re: Re: Re: 2 questions on send_timeout (maybe bugs)

Maxim Dounin May 20, 2011 07:34AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 157
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready