Tomasz Pajor
October 27, 2009 10:00AM
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> If I understand the code correctly, when I don't have the cache file,
>>>> request is going directly
>>>> to upstream, so when I have 100 request at the time when I don't have
>>>> the cache file yet, all
>>>> those requests will go to upstream servers, am I correct?
>>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>> Wouldn't it be better to send only one request, and tell other to wait
>> for the page when updating is set?
>>
> Yes, of course, it would be better, however, currently it is not implemented.
Do You see any chance of implementing this in near future?
Subject Author Posted

proxy_cache_use_stale, updating question

Tomasz Pajor October 27, 2009 08:58AM

Re: proxy_cache_use_stale, updating question

Igor Sysoev October 27, 2009 09:06AM

Re: proxy_cache_use_stale, updating question

Tomasz Pajor October 27, 2009 09:34AM

Re: proxy_cache_use_stale, updating question

Igor Sysoev October 27, 2009 09:44AM

Re: proxy_cache_use_stale, updating question

Tomasz Pajor October 27, 2009 10:00AM

Re: proxy_cache_use_stale, updating question

Igor Sysoev October 27, 2009 10:10AM

Re: proxy_cache_use_stale, updating question

Tomasz Pajor October 27, 2009 10:28AM

Re: proxy_cache_use_stale, updating question

Maxim Dounin October 27, 2009 09:46AM

Re: proxy_cache_use_stale, updating question

TonyT January 28, 2010 02:57AM

Re: proxy_cache_use_stale, updating question

timotta July 24, 2012 10:24PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 257
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready