I guess Nginx will be much better than Apache.

If we compare NGINX+PHP-FPM *vs* APACHE+PHP-FPM then PHP-FPM being common
part, comparison need to be done between Nginx and Apache.
Nginx itself is way better than Apache as it takes very less memory.

Our server CPU never crossed 1.0 load level since we moved to Nginx even
with continuous rise in traffic. In Apache days, we had a cron job to reboot
server every 24-hours!

--
Rahul Bansal | Founder & CEO | rtCamp Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Skype: rahul286 | Twitter: @rahul286 | Web: http://rtcamp.com/



On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Phil Bayfield <phil@techlightenment.com>wrote:

> You'll find results vary per application, but generally Nginx + PHP-FPM
> performs better than Apache + Mod_PHP.
> I'm not sure how this would compare to Apache + PHP-FPM or PHP-CGI.
>
>
> On 19 October 2010 00:20, <iptablez@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Easy isn't a problem. Because nginx is easier actually :)
>>
>> I just wondering which is giving a best performance when serving a dynamic
>> page (trough php), php-fpm or apache
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joe <frumentius@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 04:23:05
>> To: <nginx@nginx.org>
>> Reply-To: nginx@nginx.org
>> Subject: Re: Nginx Vs Apache in Dynamic Page
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nginx mailing list
>> nginx@nginx.org
>> http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nginx mailing list
>> nginx@nginx.org
>> http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
>
_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx