On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:58:30AM +0200, Joe Bofh wrote:

> Igor,
>
> I do not see the open_file_cache directive documented on the wiki. Is
> this different from "open_log_file_cache" which is documented? If not,
> what is the difference...

It's similar to open_log_file_cache, but have additional directive:

open_file_cache_errors [on|off]; # default is off

which allows to cache open file errors: not found, etc.

> --J
>
> Igor Sysoev wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 04:43:05PM +0200, Roger Pack wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Though probably wouldn't be tons faster.
> >> Thoughts?
> >
> > I do not think that using libev in nginx will change anything.
> >
> > Probably, the following settings may slightly improve or worsen:
> >
> > 1) turing sendfile off: it may be not effective on small files.
> > Also not that lighttz does not read file at all each request.
> >
> > 2) using open file cache, it saves 3 syscalls per request (open, fstat,
> > close):
> >
> > open_file_cache max=1000 inactive=20s;
> > open_file_cache_valid 30s;
> > open_file_cache_min_uses 2;
> > open_file_cache_errors on;
> >
> > 3) using buffered log:
> >
> > access_log /path/to/access.log buffer=32k;
> >
> > or turing it off at all:
> >
> > access_log off;
> >
> > 4) using 1 worker.
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--
Igor Sysoev
http://sysoev.ru/en/