Done! Thanks for the excellent work in the past 2012! 2013/1/9 Andrew Alexeev <andrew@nginx.com>: > Hello, > > We had a pretty packed 2012 in regards to nginx development. We've got a lot of feedback too from a variety of users. > > However as we gear up for the new development cycle in 2013, we'd appreciate a lot if you could spare 7-10 minutes of your time and take a look aby deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
在 2012年4月27日 下午8:22,Maxim Dounin <mdounin@mdounin.ru> 写道: > Hello! > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:06:02PM +0800, Delta Yeh wrote: > >> Using built-in specs. >> Target: i486-linux-gnu >> Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian >> 4.3.5-4' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs >> --enable-lanby deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
Using built-in specs. Target: i486-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 4.3.5-4' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --enable-multiarch --enable-linker-build-id --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls --wby deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
After revert svn r4577 of 1.2.0 , I get almost the same benchmark result with 1.2.0 and 1.1.17. So it seems r4577 descrease nginx 1.2.0 performance by 30-40%( a lot of connect timeout reported by loadrunner) in my test lab. nginx box OS is debian squeeze 32bit, CPU is intel core2 . 在 2012年4月27日 下午4:43,Delta Yeh <delta.yeh@gmail.com> 写道: > The loadrunner output ofby deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
The loadrunner output of 1.1.19 is attached, there are many connection timeout error reported by loadrunner. My latest test show that 1.1.18 is OK , so changes between 1.1.18 and 1.1.19 make things worse in my test lab. the os is debian squeeze 32bit, the config is : user root root; worker_rlimit_nofile 81920; worker_processes 2; pid /secone/var/run/nginx.pid; error_log /dev/null error; pcreby deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
I use loadrunner, and although get the conclusion:1.2.0 is slower than 1.1.12 I observe connect timeout error in loadrunner console, but I didn't see such error in 1.1.12. For 1.2.0 , the rps line dive to very lower every 15-20 seconds, I think it because connect to nginx timeout . I test 1.1.17 , the result is almost the same as 1.1.12. I then test 1.1.19 , the result is like 1.2.0, So whaby deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
I use jemeter to get a static file and observe the request per second. For nginx 1.2, I observe the result output stuck for a second ,then decrease. After 2 or 3 times of such stuck, the result become stable. 在 2012年4月26日 下午6:35,Valentin V. Bartenev <ne@vbart.ru> 写道: > On Thursday 26 April 2012 13:50:40 Delta Yeh wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I did a siby deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
Hi, I did a simple load test for 1.2 and found that 1.2 is slower than 1.1.12 ? client---nginx(1.2/.1.12)----nginx(1.1.12) The tested nginx worked as a reverse proxy before another nginx box which serve static file, upstream keepalive is not enbaled. Same test suite , the only difference is the version of nginx. 1.2.0 is about 30% slower . BR, DeltaY ___________________________by deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
nginx use memory pool for each http request. If the request is never-ending, more and more memory will be allocated. 2012/1/18 <nginxlist@serverphorums.com>: > Hi, > > We are using nginx to proxy to 4 back end servers. And we terminate SSL at nginx. We use nginx in a somewhat special way in that we make 1 HTTP GET and the back-end servers give a very very long (essentially never-eby deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
Maxim, Is it possible to also merge the patch that proxy_bind support variables when you fix this issue? Thanks in advance. BR, DeltaY 2011/12/25 Maxim Dounin <mdounin@mdounin.ru>: > Hello! > > On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 03:16:25AM -0500, mojiz wrote: > >> I don't know if this is appropriate place or not but there is a bug with >> proxy_bind, the directive has to bby deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
Hi, I want to know whether subrequest can be used in log phase. I want to store some info in redis only for the requests with response code of 200. I'm planning to develop a c module which work in log phase . Thanks in advance. BR, DeltaY _______________________________________________ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginxby deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
So if I want to limit total connection to one uri, I can do it by: limit_conn_zone $host$uri zone=peruri:10m; server { ... location / { limit_conn peruri 10; } } but because uri is 2011/11/25 Maxim Dounin <mdounin@mdounin.ru>: > Hello! > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:03:39AM +0800, Delta Yeh wrote: > >> 2011/11/14 Igor Sysoevby deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
2011/11/14 Igor Sysoev <igor@sysoev.ru>: > Changes with nginx 1.1.8 14 Nov 2011 > > *) Change: the ngx_http_limit_zone_module was renamed to the > ngx_http_limit_conn_module. > > *) Change: the "limit_zone" directive was superseded by the > "limit_conn_zone" directby deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
So to resolve large cookie issue, the config should be: location / { large_client_header_buffers 4 32k; proxy_buffer_size 32k; proxy_pass .... } For response, default proxy_buffers should be OK for most web application. 2011/11/3 Maxim Dounin <mdounin@mdounin.ru>: > Hello! > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:49:52AM +0800, Delta Yeh wrote: > >> Hi, >by deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
Hi, According to http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_core_module.html#large_client_header_buffers, for long uri or large cookie from browser, I can use large_client_header_buffers . For the large cookie from web server via Set-Cookie, how to set proxy buffer? Should I set proxy_buffer_size the same size as large_client_header_buffers? Or set the proxy_buffers the same as largeby deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
Multiple worker threads against worker process? 2011/10/27 Brian Akins <brian@akins.org>: > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Igor Sysoev <igor@sysoev.ru> wrote: >> >> > And is any one know whether and when >> > multithread will be supported? >> >> Probably, in 2.0. > > What would be the usage of multi-threads? > > > >by deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
I think what Calin want is limit the concurrent request number to URI not from remote ip I don't know whether " limit_req_zone $uri zone=one:10m rate=1r/s; " can achieve this. 2011/10/13 Simon Liu <simohayha.bobo@gmail.com>: > You can use limit req module: http://wiki.nginx.org/HttpLimitReqModule . > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Calin Don <calin@presslabby deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
Hi, During my test of nginx_udplog module, I run into a nginx segment fault. In nginx conf file, I don't set nginx error log, I set access_udplog 192.168.1.1 main; but 192.168.1.1 udp port 514 is not open. When I send a request, nginx crashed. gdb info: #0 0x0805a4b0 in ngx_log_error_core (level=4, log=0x812c3d4, err=111, fmt=0x80e2437 "send() failed") at src/core/ngx_log.by deltay - Nginx Development
VC: 1 $ for each domain powerby nginx Igor: 3million VC:....,OK. 2011/10/12 Igor Sysoev <igor@sysoev.ru>: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:03:49AM +0800, Sharl.Jimh.Tsin wrote: >> 在 2011-10-11二的 12:29 -0700,Michael Shadle写道: >> > http://nginx.net/nginx-venture-funding.html >> > >> > Great job, Igor. NGINX is hitting prime time. >> >by deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
Congratulations from Shanghai, China! 2011/9/28 Igor Sysoev <igor@sysoev.ru>: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:20:21PM +0200, Antoine Bonavita wrote: >> Given the amount of times Sep 28th 1970 is mentioned in the nginx code >> (see below), I am putting a rough guess that this is your birthday. >> So, in this very special day, I wanted to thank you for your amazing >>by deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
Can't reproduce it on nginx 1.1.1, so this bug is introduced later? 2011/9/20 Maxim Dounin <mdounin@mdounin.ru>: > Hello! > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:10:09PM +0800, Delta Yeh wrote: > > [...] > >> (gdb) bt >> #0 ngx_destroy_pool (pool=0x0) at src/core/ngx_palloc.c:50 >> #1 0x0808f8a8 in ngx_http_upstream_finalize_request (r=0x810fbc8, >>by deltay - Nginx Development
Thanks you Maxim, you are always the top nginx patch producer!! There are still a lot of your patches missing in the nginx SVN head, will they be merged ? 2011/9/20 Maxim Dounin <mdounin@mdounin.ru>: > Hello! > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:10:09PM +0800, Delta Yeh wrote: > > [...] > >> (gdb) bt >> #0 ngx_destroy_pool (pool=0x0) at src/core/ngx_palloc.c:50 &gby deltay - Nginx Development
I've merged proxy_bind variable patch from Maxim, so there is some difference of line number in some source file. nginx: nginx version: 1.1.3 nginx: built by gcc 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-4) nginx: TLS SNI support enabled nginx: configure arguments: --prefix=/usr --pid-path=/usr/var --with-cpu-opt=pentium4 --with-pcre --with-ipv6 --without-http_autoindex_module --without-http_ssi_module --without-htby deltay - Nginx Development
Hi Igor, I apply your patch against svn trunk, it fix the crash. Thanks . 2011/8/3 Igor Sysoev <igor@sysoev.ru>: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 01:26:04PM +0800, Delta Yeh wrote: >> Thanks , after apply the patch, crash won't happen again. > > Could you test another attached patch ? > > > -- > Igor Sysoev > > _______________________________________________ &by deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
Thanks , after apply the patch, crash won't happen again. 2011/8/2 Maxim Dounin <mdounin@mdounin.ru>: > Hello! > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 04:35:28PM +0800, Delta Yeh wrote: > >> Hi, >> Nginx crash if switch http to https, steps to reproduce are : >> 1. setup a normal config of http >> 2. start nginx >> 3. edit config file and add: >>by deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
Hi, Nginx crash if switch http to https, steps to reproduce are : 1. setup a normal config of http 2. start nginx 3. edit config file and add: ssl on; ssl_certificate /path/to/root.cert; ssl_certificate_key /path/to//root.key; ssl_client_certificate /path/to//root.ca.cert; 4. kill -HUP pid_of_nginx 5. nginx crashed. If I use the following cfg to start nginx http :by deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
Hi, I'm doing a test for nginx to proxy ipv6 requests, client(v6)----(v6)nginx(v6)----(v6)www The nginx CPU is 99% According to the post in the mailing list, nginx doesn't support ipv6 upstream, but I think it is better report an error other than 99% cpu if ipv6 address is used in upstream. BTW, any plan to support ipv6 upstream? BR, DeltaY _____________________________________________by deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English
Good news! Many nginx users like me are waiting for this feature,:) 2011/5/30 agentzh <agentzh@gmail.com>: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Delta Yeh <delta.yeh@gmail.com> wrote: >> What's the status of ngx_proxy_more ? >> > > I'll start working on it (or something preliminary) in August. I've > been pretty busy with bug fixes and adding new features to ourby deltay - Nginx Development
What's the status of ngx_proxy_more ? 2010/11/29 Weibin Yao <nbubingo@gmail.com>: > agentzh at 2010-11-26 18:08 wrote: >> >> Hi, folks! >> >> Here's the first draft of our nginx module development plan in the >> next year or so: >> >> http://agentzh.org/misc/nginx/roadmap.html >> > > Great job. I'm looking forward to the ngx_proxy_mby deltay - Nginx Development
Hi, I have interests in this variable. Would you please send me the whole patch ? I will test it. Thanks in advance. BR, DeltaY 2010/12/8 Roman Vasilyev <roman@anchorfree.com>: > Hi, > > I've added very useful for me variable which helps get destination IP from > netfilter NAT table, in this case we don't need to make extra resolving > requests, adding code for this varby deltay - Nginx Mailing List - English