tonyschwartz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > How ready is this for production? I seem to be getting a lot of > intermittent timeouts/dropped connections to the backend or something > doing upstream proxying. Just wondering before I go digging into this > any more. It is ready for production use and it used in production servers, just keep an eby itpp2012 - Nginx Mailing List - English
disable gzip, sendfile off, use something else then epoll, disable proxy_cache_path and take it from there to see if it still happens.by itpp2012 - Nginx Mailing List - English
You might try; ssl_session_cache builtin:4000; which seems to work ok as its processed inside openssl only.by itpp2012 - Nginx Mailing List - English
Felix Quintana Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I have configured the server to accept SSL connections and after two > or three requests always gives the error: > nginx.exe has encountered a problem and needs to close. [...] > ssl_session_cache shared:SSL:10m; This is a known issue, ssl_session_cache has a bug when it attempts to useby itpp2012 - Nginx Mailing List - English
Try this version: http://nginx-win.ecsds.eu/by itpp2012 - How to...
> I've heard that stunned does not scale very well. I'm looking at > managing a lot of simultaneous ssl connections hence using Nginx. You can loadbalance them, even create a pool for one worker with Lua and expand them as needed.by itpp2012 - Nginx Mailing List - English
tbamise Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Is it possible to use a different set of certs for the client side and > another set for the upstream server side? Use a tunnel like stunnel to encrypt upstreams, which supports client certs.by itpp2012 - Nginx Mailing List - English
tonyschwartz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > This is very nice. Thanks. I noticed the > encrypted-session-nginx-module is missing from this build. Is there No reason to omit it other then no one has requested it :) I'll have a look and add it if there are no cross source/module conflicts for the next release, at the moment we're busy with integratingby itpp2012 - Nginx Mailing List - English
If its a repetitive block you could use an external file and a single include line. http://nginx.org/en/docs/ngx_core_module.html#includeby itpp2012 - Nginx Mailing List - English
This might give some more insight: http://mgalgs.github.io/2013/05/04/localhost-considered-harmful.htmlby itpp2012 - Other discussion
Didn't maxim explain it was a config mistake? which also includes the v6 error, if you have a separate v6 issue I'd like to see that specific errorlog.by itpp2012 - Other discussion
The delay sounds like a dns issue, never seen it happen though, I'll put it on the testlist. About the v6 error, I need the errorlogging and config used to reproduce the issue. "http://[::1]:3000/api/xxxxx" <- is this properly formatted?by itpp2012 - Other discussion
If your willing you could try some of the releases here http://nginx-win.ecsds.eu/ 1.5.10.1 will be out soon, but 1.5.9.1 should not display the behavior your having.by itpp2012 - Other discussion
The error says "directory index of "/home/sqstat/public_html/sarg/" is forbidden" which means there are no html files there while it tries to display the contents which is only allowed when you add autoindex on; see that link I posted.by itpp2012 - Nginx Mailing List - English
You could try sendfile off;by itpp2012 - Other discussion
Ah xp no problem but w7 the problem, this is most likely a ASLR issue, are you using limit_req_zone or other options that used shared memory ? shared memory don't work beyond XP, either keep nginx on XP or don't use shared memory functions until this is fixed, a proper and permanent fix is on the way for my nginx for windows version.by itpp2012 - Other discussion
Maybe you should explain what you expect to happen, if you expect to see the contents then that link has the answer.by itpp2012 - Nginx Mailing List - English
Switch over to nginx, if the problem still exists we might be able to help.by itpp2012 - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
I use many tomcat backends with nginx as frontend balancing proxy and have not seen this anywhere, if possible could you create a small VM linux distro with nginx to see what happens with open ports between nginx and the backends? All I can see in your logs is a timeout to the backend, this can be caused by anything, wrong expected http version, specific tcp parameters, etc..... Also try the olderby itpp2012 - Other discussion
http://www.nginxtips.com/how-to-enable-nginx-directory-listing/by itpp2012 - Nginx Mailing List - English
Can you reach the backend directly without issues? anything in the backend logs?by itpp2012 - Other discussion
This patch, http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?29,246966,246988#msg-246988 fixes it.by itpp2012 - Nginx Mailing List - English
A different way would to use Lua and an alias table, for a dynamic site I use this to allow a site multiple aliases all directing to the same root, its a simple array with 2 lines for each main site, 1 as server_name and line 2 endless aliases. Its fast and no need to edit nginx.conf just edit a plain ascii file.by itpp2012 - Nginx Mailing List - English
src\http\ngx_http_request.c(728) : warning C4701: potentially uninitialized local variable 'data' used VC 2010. From full source nginx-01e2a5bcdd8fby itpp2012 - Nginx Mailing List - English
Maybe this: http://serverfault.com/questions/347586/nginx-warns-server-name-has-strange-symbols If not what does the logs say?by itpp2012 - How to...
Post nginx.conf and relevant parts for this site so we can all have a look where its going wrong.by itpp2012 - How to...
In ngx_http_core_try_files_phase (ngx_http_core_module.c) I can see how $uri $uri/ =404 are handled, but for example in; try_files /test.html $uri $uri/ =404; where(or how) is /test.html handled?by itpp2012 - Nginx Mailing List - English
Make sure nothing else is using port 80 like IIS.by itpp2012 - How to...
renenglish Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sorry I can’t get it . > > If host A has added the counter and failed to response, the request > would be failed over to host B with successful response, so the > counter would be added twines. Wouldn’t it ? Then a condition must occur where host A fails right after processing the request, theyby itpp2012 - Nginx Mailing List - English
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |