On Oct 31, 2014, at 7:24 AM, Maxim Dounin <mdounin@mdounin.ru> wrote: > Hello! > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 04:33:09PM -0700, Piotr Sikora wrote: > >> Hey Maxim, >> >>> - SSLv3 is still important from compatibility point of view, there >>> are various clients which doesn't support (or enable by default) >>> anything better; >> &gby nginxorg - Nginx Development
On Aug 6, 2014, at 8:43 AM, Pankaj Kaushik <dev.panky2014@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I want to see gui for nginx where i want to look at how ngnix is distributing load among set of given servers. > > Can anybody let me now from where i can get nginx gui or some kind of control panel for that Apologies, but let's move these questions out of nginx-devel@ - this is notby nginxorg - Nginx Development
On Dec 19, 2013, at 6:41 PM, "justin" <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > Any update or eta on when we can expect spdy protocol version 3 in the 1.5.X > branch? Pretty soon, stay tuned and thanks for the patience! > Thanks. > > Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,245732,245732#msg-245732 > > _______________________________________________by nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
Hi, On Dec 3, 2013, at 1:45 AM, Shankar Dagadu Borate <borate@adobe.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > We are using nginx as proxy server in all our production deployment. The nginx server proxy the http request to Amazon ELB (elastic load balancer) using upstream module. Currently we are seeing timeout issues in NGINX because NGINX caches the IP address on start. Now when there is changeby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Oct 22, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Darren Pilgrim <list_nginx@bluerosetech.com> wrote: > On 10/19/2013 5:07 PM, Darren Pilgrim wrote: >> On 10/14/2013 9:37 AM, Andrew Alexeev wrote: >>> http://barry.wordpress.com/2012/06/16/nginx-spdy-and-automattic/ >> >> How much capital would you need to do this? I'd contribute to a >> crowd-funding campaign for this andby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Oct 14, 2013, at 8:01 PM, codemonkey <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > Contemplating switching my site over to Jetty to take advantage of spdy/3 > and push, but would rather stay with nginx really... > > Is there a "rough" ETA on spdy3 in nginx? 1 month? 6 months? 2 years? > > Thanks, sorry if this is a frequent request... It is! Considering it, but frankby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Sep 27, 2013, at 7:09 PM, Thijs Koerselman <thijskoerselman@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I posted this on stackoverflow already but I thought I might have more luck here :) > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19023777/how-to-make-proxy-revalidate-resource-from-origin > > In short, I can't find a way to make nginx revalidate a cached resource with the origin. Wheby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Sep 14, 2013, at 14:49, kyprizel <kyprizel@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I'm thinking on design of patch for adding distributed SSL session cache and have a question - > is it possible and ok to create keepalive upstream to some storage (memcached/redis/etc), then use it from ngx_ssl_new_session/ngx_ssl_get_cached_session ? I'm hoping someone from our dev team will follow up withby nginxorg - Nginx Development
On Sep 10, 2013, at 11:25 PM, itpp2012 <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > 10:27 10-9-2013: B02 build > > Based on nginx 1.4.2 with; > pcre-8.32 > zlib-1.2.8 > openssl-1.0.1e > + Compiled with: FD_SETSIZE = 16384 (original Windows source files > modified) > + Now capable to handle C250K ! (with optimization registry file) > + Added Windows optimization registryby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Jul 25, 2013, at 2:49 AM, John Watson <john@disqus.com> wrote: > Upgraded from 1.2.9 to 1.4.1 and now started getting: > > could not build the variables_hash, you should increase either variables_hash_max_size: 512 or variables_hash_bucket_size: 64 > > Same configuration and even dropped (2) 3rd party modules. > > nginx.conf and ./configure params: https://gistby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Jul 4, 2013, at 4:57 AM, "badtzhou" <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > We have several hundred Gs of file cached using nginx. Every time we > restarted nginx, the cache loader process will appear and server load will > go super high and respond very slowly. > > Looks like cache loader process is very I/O intensive and take a long time > to finish. Is there anywaby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
Hi JackB, On May 22, 2013, at 1:38 PM, JackB <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > Hello, > > on your Site (http://nginx.com/products.html) you are comparing NGINX SE > with the Open Source version. The table states "Basic" and "Enhanced" on > many core features of NGINX. The SE/"Enhanced" column offers additional > information by hovering with thby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Apr 26, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hi! > >> Cfr. http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/526439/30/0/threaded >> >> Is 1.4.x release affected? > > I guess. Please see the "recent nginx security issue announce" thread. We are still investigating. So far we can't confirm it's a full disclosure. > Cheers, > Lukas > _by nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Apr 18, 2013, at 12:37 PM, "HajoLOcke" <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > Hello, > > i use nginx 1.0.12 and 1.2.4 > I know there is a special healthcheckmodule. But i want to know if nginx ist > doing a kind of healtcheck in its basic Configuration without the special > HttpHealthcheckModule. Is nginx able to check and/or weight his backend in a > simple baseby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
Hi Dave, On Apr 12, 2013, at 2:34 PM, ix8675874@sent.at wrote: > Hi, > > I just started with a small company that's got a bunch of web apps being > served up from a bunch of different web servers. Some are 'appliances', > most are Apache. > > It's a mess of an infrastrucutre -- slow and . My long term plan is to > convert to one lighter weight platform with commercialby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Mar 28, 2013, at 3:57 PM, Lukas Tribus wrote: >> Why would you doubt that? Of course, my machines may be bigger than the norm... > > Because nginx doesn't do tcp splicing. Is my assumption wrong; are you able to > forward 20Gbps with nginx? Then yes, probably you have huge hardware, which isn't > necessary with haproxy. Just curious, are you referring to "splice-auto&qby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
Jay, On Mar 16, 2013, at 12:37 PM, Jay Oster wrote: > Hi Maxim, > > Thanks for the suggestion! It looks like packet drop is the culprit here. The initial SYN packet doesn't receive a corresponding SYN-ACK from the upstream servers, so after a 1-second timeout (TCP Retransmission TimeOut), the packet is retransmitted. The question is still *why* this only occurs through nginx. > >by nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Mar 3, 2013, at 10:58 AM, 张沈鹏 wrote: > I write this and it success proxyed , but I want to let the proxy use SPDY > there is no how to use SPDY in revese proxy in the document There's not SPDY for upstream servers in nginx at this time, so you can't. > server{ > listen 443; > server_name 42btc.com; > > ssl on; > ssl_certificate /etc/ssl/cby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Feb 24, 2013, at 5:28 PM, SiNA Rabbani <sina@redteam.io> wrote: > How do you guys like the software to be names? NGINX or Nginx or NGiNX? Either "nginx" or "NGINX". > Thanks, > SiNA > > -- > “Be the change you want to see in the world.” Gandhi > > XMPP: inf0@jabber.ccc.de a5dae15f45a37e9768f6deae7b54807fc4942ec9 > twitter.com/wwwireby nginxorg - Nginx Development
On Feb 24, 2013, at 5:28 PM, SiNA Rabbani <sina@redteam.io> wrote: > How do you guys like the software to be names? NGINX or Nginx or NGiNX? Either "nginx" or "NGINX". > Thanks, > SiNA > > -- > “Be the change you want to see in the world.” Gandhi > > XMPP: inf0@jabber.ccc.de a5dae15f45a37e9768f6deae7b54807fc4942ec9 > twitter.com/wwwireby nginxorg - Nginx Development
On Feb 18, 2013, at 4:03 PM, perone wrote: > Is there any updates on the Websocket proxy support ? Everything I found is > only this: http://trac.nginx.org/nginx/milestone/1.3.13 Yes, there will be an update very soon. Be patient and stay tuned! _______________________________________________ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginxby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:57 PM, pricne5 wrote: > What is the correct way to proxing to any remote webservice? How to use > nginx in front of IIS or other web server, who serves webservices? > > As an example we have any remote SOAP webservice at > http://B:8089/getClientService/getClientService?wsdl. In SOAP document of > these webservice we have endpoint location: > ..... >by nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Jan 23, 2013, at 10:19 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote: > Hello! > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 07:27:42PM +0200, Aliaksandr Valialkin wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Maxim Dounin <mdounin@mdounin.ru> wrote: >> >> >>> I don't think that it will fit as a cache store for nginx. In >>> particular, with quick look through sources I don'tby nginxorg - Nginx Development
On Jan 15, 2013, at 11:28 PM, CM Fields wrote: > I just wanted to thank the developers for releasing Nginx v1.3.11 and the optimized SPDY patch v58. > > I run a non-profit https site serving static content (10KB-1MB) averaging 500 connections per second on FreeBSD 9.1 with zfs. With nginx v1.3.9 and spdy v54 we were completing client requests in less than 10ms, 72% of the time. With ngiby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Jan 14, 2013, at 11:41 PM, itpp2012 wrote: > Done! maybe something to think about, allow a feature request to be > sponsored, for example SiT has this, if many sponsor a request it gets done > faster or if few sponsor a request, it requires higher sponsor fees to get > it done. > > Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,234835,235071#msg-235071 Thanks forby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Jan 14, 2013, at 7:35 PM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Hai Andrew, > > Am 09-01-2013 11:01, schrieb Andrew Alexeev: >> Hello, > > > >> http://nginx-survey.questionpro.com/ >> This survey will help us greatly to define goals and adjust >> priorities in 2013 and to make nginx better. >> Many thanks in advance! > > It would be nice to have aby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Jan 10, 2013, at 12:01 PM, Alexey V. Karagodov wrote: > в аттаче решение для пингвинов > есть ещё для бзди, если интересно > для венды - не ведаю, возможно-ли > для мака и солярки тоже не в курсе > > в случае с пингвинёй надо изменить исby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - Russian
Hello, We had a pretty packed 2012 in regards to nginx development. We've got a lot of feedback too from a variety of users. However as we gear up for the new development cycle in 2013, we'd appreciate a lot if you could spare 7-10 minutes of your time and take a look at our online survey: http://nginx-survey.questionpro.com/ This survey will help us greatly to define goals and adjust prioritiby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Dec 20, 2012, at 0:02, Ian Hobson <ian.hobson@ntlworld.com> wrote: > On 16/12/2012 07:58, Nick Zavaritsky wrote: >> Hi! >> >> According to the roadmap at http://trac.nginx.org/nginx/roadmap, the support for websockets is planned for release in 2 month. Is there any preview code available yet? It would be nice to start playing with this feature early on. >> &gby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Dec 17, 2012, at 2:14 PM, Lasse Laursen wrote: > Offtopic: > > Throughout its history, Wolff Olins has presented controversial work.[23][24] Its piper design for BT in 1991 attracted a great deal of opposition.The company was also responsible for the short-lived $110m (£75m) re-branding of PwC Consulting to Monday in 2002. The launch of the London 2012 brand in 2007 was met with widby nginxorg - Nginx Mailing List - English