itpp2012, I'll take a look at having a load balancing nginx pass to other nginx instances. I would still prefer to add some completion ports or something similar to nginx, but that will obviously take a lot longer than just running the chained-nginx scenario. Thanks.by chicagoben - Nginx Mailing List - English
itpp2012 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think we might benefit more from solving the > select problem, with 8 separate workers as > mentioned before you're still stuck to 1024*8 > which isn't that much more, found an interesting > discussion about select, why it's used and why it > should not be used on windows systems: > http://grouby chicagoben - Nginx Mailing List - English
Well this is all for one site where I want multiple workers to speed up response time if any particular request is slow. Can you explain how I could forward from one nginx to say 4 other ones, and then those could talk to my WSGI application? Thanks.by chicagoben - Nginx Mailing List - English
How much work do you think it will take to get the Windows build to support having multiple worker processes? Is anyone already working on this? I volunteer to help later this month if I get a little guidance on what is required. Thanks, Benby chicagoben - Nginx Mailing List - English
I sent this message to the mailing list but I haven't seen it show up anywhere. I apologize if somehow this becomes a duplicate. Windows 7 64-bit NGINX 1.0.8 (32-bit) I run nginx with 1 worker process. When I do nginx -s stop or nginx -s quit, I get a popup about an unhandled win32 exception in nginx.exe. If there is no debugger on the machine I do not see anything, but my developmentby chicagoben - Nginx Mailing List - English