Tested ab and confirmed terminated requests with reloads during run (complete output pasted at the end). Failed requests: 180 (Connect: 0, Receive: 24, Length: 78, Exceptions: 78) ab reports reports terminated connections while receiving. This should not happen at all when executing a reload. But: If I run ab without keepalive connections, it is not possible for me to get failby JackB - Nginx Mailing List - English
With a plain standard configuration I can confirm behavior of wrk on Ubuntu 16.04 (Linux 4.4.0): Running without reload during run: $ wrk -d 30 -c 100 -t 20 http://localhsot/ Running 30s test @ http://localhost/ 20 threads and 100 connections Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev Latency 2.45ms 0.89ms 29.75ms 86.77% Req/Sec 2.07k 279.09 5.32kby JackB - Nginx Mailing List - English
The subject is a quote of Maxim Dounin in a discussion found here: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?29,246885,246902#msg-246902 It would be nice to have a detailed list of SPDY functionality that could be used as a DDoS vector. And it would be even better, to have an nginx configuration example to workaround each problem without simply disabling features. Last, should there be a default confiby JackB - Nginx Mailing List - English
Valentin V. Bartenev Wrote: > > This might be a little off topic, but how can one upgrade nginx on ubuntu > > with the official ppa via apt without having a restart of nginx but an > > upgrade instead? (/etc/init.d/nginx upgrade) > Please note, there is no "official ppa". > > Official nginx repositories for Ubuntu (and other Linux ditros) are > heby JackB - Nginx Mailing List - English
openletter Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If you are using the apt-get upgrade or aptitude upgrade commands, the > service will be restarted for you. This might be a little off topic, but how can one upgrade nginx on ubuntu with the official ppa via apt without having a restart of nginx but an upgrade instead? (/etc/init.d/nginx upgrade)by JackB - Nginx Mailing List - English
Hello, on your Site (http://nginx.com/products.html) you are comparing NGINX SE with the Open Source version. The table states "Basic" and "Enhanced" on many core features of NGINX. The SE/"Enhanced" column offers additional information by hovering with the mouse over the rows. Those additional information are listing well known features from the Open Source versioby JackB - Nginx Mailing List - English
Are they all using the same cache directoy/NFS mount point? Sharing a cache directory seems not to be supported.by JackB - Nginx Mailing List - English
highpointe Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > What metric are you concerned with? None. I just wanted to point out, that results of performance tests heavily depend on your location and client computer. Without any special settings I could easily top w3elfs results. When doing performance tests, always check: - is the client-power sufficient? (packet rate,by JackB - Nginx Mailing List - English
Hi, I think it is client problem (bandwidth or cpu). This is my short test on your server: Xeon CPU and 10 Mbit/s line ab -n 10000 -c 40 http://50.56.117.62/index.html This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 655654 $> Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/ Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/ Benchmarking 5by JackB - Nginx Mailing List - English