It is not possible in 5.2.x SVN = 5.3.x+ only (there is an interim 5.2 / 5.3 from github/launchpad, but it is not supported anymore as the new SVN version is better, and I do not believe it implements anything special for 5.2.x, so there is no reason for it anymore) On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Dayo <dakanji@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 22, 8:05 pm, Jérôme Loyet <m..by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
No it does not. You have to use static in 5.2. There is a dynamic one in the new svn version which is for 5.3+. On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:23 AM, Dayo <dakanji@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all. > > I managed to get php-fpm going on a php 5.2.13 installation using the > patch from the php-fpm site. > > However, I notice that it doesn't seem to respond to setting "apache- &by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
In the new php core version ("svn" ... for 5.3+ only) Jerome just created a patch that he is committing soon for include support. On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:19 AM, Dayo <dakanji@gmail.com> wrote: > Main thing needed is to allow individual pools to be read in similar > to how most use Nginx. i.e include /somefolder/*.pool. > Not so hot on confusing global options. > >by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
I wound up using RentACoder.com - I couldn't find someone who knew nginx + Kerberos/GSSAPI/etc. - but I did find someone who knew C and was able to hack something up. It still could use someone who knows nginx module development and/or Kerberos to look at the respective pieces... This is the output from that. I funded it myself, and part of the terms were to maintain a BSD license so it could beby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
This is awesome to hear! Great benefits for everyone :) On Apr 19, 2010, at 7:32 PM, agentzh <agentzh@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, folks! > > Sorry, this is not an email that announce a new release of one of our > modules. Rather, this is a "spam" :P > > We're looking for (senior) nginx C developers to work with us in > Taobao.com's data department here in Beijingby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
we seem to do a "best we can do" help on the patch still typically. And we should - 5.2 is very prevalent still On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:34 AM, Jérôme Loyet <ml@fatbsd.com> wrote: > 2010/4/17 Michael Shadle <mike503@gmail.com>: >> http://php-fpm.org/bugs/ >> >> Let me know if you think anything is insufficient. >> > > Only the SVN Version iby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Yeah but it also means it's brand new and not necessarily 100% :) I wish I had 5.3 code I supported so I could try it out myself! On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:38 AM, Jérôme Loyet <ml@fatbsd.com> wrote: > 2010/4/17 Michael Shadle <mike503@gmail.com>: >> Unless Jerome disagrees since he put it in place I would still call >> the >> apache-like or dynamic process manaby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
http://php-fpm.org/bugs/ Let me know if you think anything is insufficient. On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Michael Shadle <mike503@gmail.com> wrote: > Alright. I'm going to make a page, but for SVN/5.3+ I'm going to link > to that page, and put down something about the patch is not supported > by the PHP team, don't report a bug there. (A little bit of a triage) -- Subscriptiby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Alright. I'm going to make a page, but for SVN/5.3+ I'm going to link to that page, and put down something about the patch is not supported by the PHP team, don't report a bug there. (A little bit of a triage) On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Antony Dovgal <tony@daylessday.org> wrote: > On 18.04.2010 00:30, Michael Shadle wrote: >> I'd like to add a section on the site about how tby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
I'd like to add a section on the site about how to report a bug. That way it is a one-stop shop on explaining the best things to try. Jerome/Antony/anyone please send me your ideas on the steps, I'll get a basic version up and we can tweak (feel free to take it off-list or on-list, whichever you feel is appropriate) I suppose it also depends on what the error is too... sometimes increasing or decby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Unless Jerome disagrees since he put it in place I would still call the apache-like or dynamic process manager experimental. Use static and adjust children appropriately. Note that dynamic is only in svn, apache-like is from launchpad and neither are in the patch (5.2) For 5.3 use svn and try that. If that doesn't work, downgrade to 5.2 and use the patch. On Apr 17, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Usby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Ouch. Please fix this in 0.8.36 :) heh On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Manlio Perillo <manlio_perillo@libero.it> wrote: > It's an easy to fix buf. > You get the warning only when caching is disabled. _______________________________________________ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginxby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
Now that I examine this, it's treating warnings as errors. Ideally this wouldn't be a warning either, but what could be going on to make this force fail? 0.8.33 = no problem 0.8.34 = problem 0.8.35 = problem OS info: Linux foo 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 20 07:32:21 EST 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux CentOS 5.4 x86_64 all up to date Where it breaks during "make" gcc -c -by mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
I thought it was called 'dynamic' now? On Apr 15, 2010, at 9:46 AM, Jérôme Loyet <ml@fatbsd.com> wrote: > 2010/4/15 DiliBau <radu1658@gmail.com>: >> From php-fpm.conf >> Set to 'no' to debug fpm >> <value name="daemonize">no</value> >> On Apr 15, 7:35 pm, Gordon Pettey <petteyg...@gmail.com> wrote:by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
2010/4/9 Jérôme Loyet <ml@fatbsd.com>: > yes but if you have 1000 pools doing nothing almost all the time, > you'll have 1000 processes doing nothing ... it's a waste of > ressources exactly. I'm thinking of how to address shared hosts with lots of users. without the "dream" approach that's the best they can do, short of just running one pool for all users like standarby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
I would say one thing - at some point you should stop looking at the webserver to make all the magic happen and push it into application logic. :) On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:22 PM, m94asr <m94asr@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I get requests that look like > > /m?http://i.abc.com/A/P?vcode=bz==&p=uid:$DFG > > I can't change the format in which I get these requests; >by mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
2010/4/8 Jérôme Loyet <ml@fatbsd.com>: > Yes but technicaly it's not that simple. The classic way to handle > connections makes you having at least one child waiting for a > connection. If we don't wan't any dedicaded child, we have to makes it > different and it'll be much more complicated. > > You should read technical documentation on the subject: > man socket >by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
2010/4/8 Jérôme Loyet <ml@fatbsd.com>: > The master process will listen on all sockets (as it does now). But it > won't fork any children. It will setup an event (libevent) on READ on > each socket. When a connection is waiting, it'll be notfied by > libevent and it'll be able to fork a child for this task. When the > child finishes its processing, it stays open for a timeoby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
On Apr 7, 2010, at 5:11 AM, "Dennis J." <djacobfeuerborn@gmail.com> wrote: > How would you go "back to root euid"? AFAIK once you dropped the > privileges you are not longer allowed to use the setgid()/setuid() > family of functions so you can never become root again. Wouldn't that require a forked process? In which case it seems like the same thing asby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Also look to make sure your extension_dir is setup properly. php 5.3.2 is different than 5.2.x probably; you may need to adjust your php..ini. On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Chris Cortese <cortese.consulting@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah I know at that time that first error is due to that file not existing > there. But this has been a 10 hour ordeal so far and I've tried many > diby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
look at the error it's looking for pdo.so and pdo_msql.so - you have pdo_mysql.so only :) typos? :) On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Chris Cortese <cortese.consulting@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, > > I also tried Jerome's config options. I still get the same problems > afterwards when trying to run php-fpm. It's still looking for a nonexistent > pdo.so. I've also triedby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:11 AM, wminside <wminside@wminside.com> wrote: > I just switched from spawn-fcgi tis morning and so far so good but I > want to make sure that I'm getting the best performance for my setup. > > I'm getting over half a million pageviews per day. mysqld is on a > separate box. I'm running 8 workers and 8192 worker_connections on > nginx btw. > &gby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
2010/4/6 Jérôme Loyet <ml@fatbsd.com>: > it's another (cleaner ?) way to do it. From my mind: you use includes > to separates pools and use reference templates to make default > directives. But I agree that includes can take care of both. > > Anyway, if both are made, will it be a problem ? The only problem would be the possibility of end user confusion. Think of how nginby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
2010/4/6 Jérôme Loyet <ml@fatbsd.com>: >> If there is no way to make them global, then I will have a too big >> php5-fpm.conf file since I need to define lots of virtual hosts. It >> really makes it hard to maintain and modify the configuration file. >> Any suggestions? > > it's in the todo list. I totaly agree with you on this :) > > I don't when it'llby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
The new format should support includes I believe.. But that will only be available with PHP core now - starting with PHP 5.4 or whatever the next sub-major version is (I don't think 5.3.4 is an option) - assuming the work is done. On Apr 6, 2010, at 6:06 AM, Ismet Togay <ismet.togay@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks to Jerome, I got php5-fpm worked! As I understand, oneby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:11 AM, RoastedPeanut <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > For example, nginx + php-fpm all under supervisord? i use nginx 0.8.x and php 5.2.13 w/ php-fpm patch + suhosin patch and it's rock solid. no supervisord or anything _______________________________________________ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginxby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
This one: http://php-fpm.org/downloads/php-5.2.12-fpm-0.5.13.diff.gz This is my build script, works like a charm. Rock solid including suhosin! #!/bin/bash BD=`pwd` VER="5.2.13" FPMVER="0.5.13" SUHVER="0.9.7" rm -rf php-${VER} wget -c http://us3.php.net/get/php-${VER}.tar.gz/from/this/mirror tar xvfz php-${VER}.tar.gz cd php-${VER} # php-fpm wget -c http://php-fpby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Dynamic upstream management has been something on my wishlist for a while. It would make nginx a smarter load balancer... I believe Piotr or someone else might have something started for this though (in combination with a module) not sure.d On Mar 18, 2010, at 11:01 AM, "metamind" <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > Hi, > > I am wanting to reverse proxy to a number ofby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
Might want to ping the php dev list. Now that 5.3.2 is out I believe it's slated to be included in 5.3.3. However I don't think they'll consider it production for a while... On Mar 16, 2010, at 9:07 PM, Robin Winslow <robin@robinwinslow.co.uk> wrote: > That'd be great. My PHP is a mess at the moment through trying to > configure it with php-fpm. I'd like to be able to tidy it uby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Searches what it's told to :) On Mar 8, 2010, at 6:51 PM, Ariadoss <ariadoss@gmail.com> wrote: > Got it for some reason it wasn't picking up stuff in subdirectories of > the extensions folder. Or is that normal behavior? > > Sorry, for the trouble and thanks for the suggestion. > > On Mar 8, 6:46 pm, Michael Shadle <mike...@gmail.com> wrote: >> never seen anyby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|