that looks like a failed include/include_once/require/require_once attempt to me, not something PHP-FPM would be concerned with... I think it's a PHP code issue. On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:30 AM, shadow77 <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > I'm seeing this PHP Warning pop up rather often in my error logs: > > > [02-Jul-2010 02:23:37] PHP Warning: Unknown: Filename cannot be empty &gby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Thomas Fritz <fritztho@gmail.com> wrote: > OK. Is it planned to add those configure options to the php-core? Or perhaps > even backported to the patch method? Someone knows? I think PHP core has enough options already and you use the .ini conf file to change things as you wish. Most of those things shouldn't need to be done during ./configure anyway,by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
because dreamcat's stuff only works with the launchpad version, which has been deprecated. the patch method only has 3 parameters afaik... pid file, things like that. On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Thomas Fritz <fritztho@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello! > > I patched php-5.2.13 with this patch "http://php-fpm.org/downloads/ > php-5.2.13-fpm-0.5.14.diff.gz" and added someby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
I wrote that. :) You can use the adaptive spawning in php 5.3 to try to craft a way to give each user a process to start at least and then a quota for each user and let them play in that. That's basically the best suggestion I personally have. And just script in something to add to the config for each user and reload php-fpm. On Jun 28, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Mark Rogers <mark@quarella.co.uk> wby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
Use php-fpm and setup one pool per user. That's all the suexec you need :) On Jun 28, 2010, at 1:26 AM, Mark Rogers <mark@quarella.co.uk> wrote: > On 27/06/10 15:10, Rahul Bansal wrote: >>> > I note from the documentation that it is fairly simple to run multiple >>> > instances of nginx behind a proxy to allow different virtual hosts to be >>> > maby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
If you're looking for external help... I'm sure there's plenty of people on the list who could offer their services (I am one of them) If you want to reply off list and give me a login I could see if there's any low hanging fruit that could be fixed quick. On Jun 19, 2010, at 7:52 AM, "speedway" <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > Thanks GM > > For now I will give it a misby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
So anything that can be done only via htaccess in apache. Its not the same level as an fpm configuration override which is system level? Since this is being passed at runtime to already established fpm workers... On Jun 18, 2010, at 11:08 AM, Jérôme Loyet <jerome@loyet.net> wrote: > 2010/6/18 Michael Shadle <mike503@gmail.com>: >> 2010/6/18 Jérôme Loyet <jerome@loyetby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
2010/6/18 Jérôme Loyet <jerome@loyet.net>: > yes you need to use \n to separate. This way the code hack to make it > works is quite simple (we can reuse as is the INI parsing stuff). If > we want to use another delimiter (space, comma), it'll be quite more > difficult to code and certainly more difficult to test and valid. I'm > notre sure we want to go with this. that's cby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Igor Sysoev <igor@sysoev.ru> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:12:51AM -0700, Michael Shadle wrote: > >> So basically space or linebreak delimited? > > I believe that linebreak. This is not nginx's feature, but PHP's one. Yeah, according to Jérôme's comment on bugs.php.net, it needs \n So it looks like \n is okay, spaces are not (but iby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
Php-fpm is a bit easier to configure and offers a lot more than just php-cgi -b. I would definitely check it out. On Jun 18, 2010, at 6:03 AM, "nfn" <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running nginx as frontend to apache + mod_php with good results. > Apache has keepalive off and is running with few threads and with the > essential modules. > > i mby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
So basically space or linebreak delimited? On Jun 18, 2010, at 5:35 AM, Jérôme Loyet <jerome@loyet.net> wrote: > 2010/6/18 Igor Sysoev <igor@sysoev.ru>: >> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:23:16AM -0400, jbruni wrote: >> >>> UPDATE >>> >>> Now, it is possible to do this way: >>> >>> >>> fastcgi_param PHP_VALUE &quby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:45 PM, grigori <grigori.kochanov@gmail.com> wrote: > Here is a discussion between Igor Sysoev and Andrei Nigmatulin: > http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=ru&ie=UTF-8&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://www.lexa.ru/nginx-ru/msg18577.html&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&twu=1&usg=ALkJrhhpoOFhf39sMIMwG0nuPhb3kz_LHQ > &by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Yeah - I was told sockets aren't an issue on modern systems but definitely had issues in the past... I still use tcp because of that and never changed... I wanted to look into sockets instead but haven't had time and I haven't ever really had issues with tcp. So if it ain't broke... On Jun 16, 2010, at 4:45 AM, "Dennis J." <djacobfeuerborn@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06/16/2010 11by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Rahul Bansal <rahul286@gmail.com> wrote: > I have setup my nginx as mentioned here - > http://wiki.nginx.org/NginxHttpFcgiModule > And I guess for this reason my APC cache is working fine! :) I believe (and from what I see and hear) the APC cache is shared by all children from the parent. So each pool can share. I don't think APC is global crossby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
php-fpm is an actual management daemon, as opposed to using spawn-fcgi which you are still responsible for controlling. If you're doing the spawn-fcgi route you might as well just use php-cgi -b and use upstart or some other controlling daemon and just do it yourself. spawn-fcgi doesn't give you anything special AFAIK. Rasmus himself uses PHP-FPM now and gave it basically a thumbs up (in person)by mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
2010/6/14 Jérôme Loyet <ml@fatbsd.com>: > I'm just saying that the old 5.2.x is not under development any more. > > I don't have time to look at the 5.2.x patch but I'll provide advises > without any problems. That's all that we ask :) It's only "support" now not "development" I wish my environments were 5.3 compliant. I host -a lot- of code, and a lot ofby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Oops. This new unified inbox is weird. Switch to tcp instead of unix sockets.. That will definitely change up your error. How many requests per second do you think you're doing? I noticed you did say you tried disabling all extensions already. On Jun 14, 2010, at 6:45 AM, "M.A.G" <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > Hello Jérôme , > I can't move into PHP 5.3.x because my scby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Jerome that's not a workable response since a lot of stuff is not 5.3.x ready :( I still say we try best effort to help people. Typically there's not a lot of questions or bugs or anything. It won't receive new features of course... MAG have you tried disabling all extensions like xcache for sure? That's one of the first things to try. I don't have the original email to look at. On Jun 14, 2010by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
We're hitting this with a simple AJAX-based file upload. The file being uploaded is only 199862 bytes. The debug output is here. I masked the hostnames and IPs (with the same length though, just in case) to protect the innocent. http://pastebin.com/7k6PihVN I am not sure if these are relevant or not, but it should be tuned to allow file uploads up to at least 100 megs. It works great, but for sby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
2010/6/7 Jérôme Loyet <ml@fatbsd.com>: > PHP_5_3_FPM is not used anymore. Please forget it. Done. I went to look on the web to see which branches were available... Perhaps that branch should be nixed :)by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
That would replace the trunk instructions only, correct? Since snaps should be a rollup of trunk, which can contain unstable code. There still needs to be instructions for the stable 5.3 version. On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:16 AM, 任晓磊 <julyclyde@gmail.com> wrote: > try snaps.php.net. It's easy than SVN. > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Michael Shadle <mike503@gmail.com&by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
2010/6/3 Jérôme Loyet <ml@fatbsd.com>: > - stable --> PHP_5_3 which one is it, exactly? http://svn.php.net/repository/php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_3/ http://svn.php.net/repository/php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_3_FPM/ Also, should there be instructions on snaps.php.net, or is that the same thing as grabbing directly from trunk (just on a nightly basis?) This is what I have so far: httby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Make sure apc.stat = 1 (I believe) That behavior sounds like apc is being told not to check stats On Jun 3, 2010, at 5:27 PM, "Nick H." <nchebb@gmail.com> wrote: > If I change a php file and upload the new version to my site, the > changes don't show up until I restart php-fpm. Is there a way to > prevent this?by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Should I change this on php-fpm.org or is this just temporary? I thought fpm was in trunk now? On Jun 3, 2010, at 8:10 AM, Antony Dovgal <tony@daylessday.org> wrote: > On 03.06.2010 19:01, Antonio Lupher wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to compile php with php-fpm on a server running CentOS >> 5.5, >> but the build is failing with the following errorsby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Always use private connections where you can. For php fastcgi engines, mysql, memcached, everything. On Jun 1, 2010, at 9:34 AM, "Mickie D" <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > Thanks Mike you are probably right but I have high amounts of > concurrent users on my site at any one time... from 500 - 800. > > I found fine tuning xcache, and memcache today has really helby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
Nginx can handle both php and static assets easily on the same machine. No need to have them on separate machines. I think you need some architecture help :) On Jun 1, 2010, at 2:43 AM, "Mickie D" <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > Thank you very much for your time MIKE ;) > > You are right it was not worth the hassle of doing it this way :( > > I have decided toby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
well it looks like you're using a public IP, which means it's over the WAN, which you should make sure is firewalled (iptables or something) so only the webserver(s) can connect, and depending on the latency between the machines it might be so slow that it doesn't make sense. On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Mickie D <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > Yeah thanks mike that worked. > >by mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
the SCRIPT_FILENAME being passed is from the nginx machine to the PHP fastcgi engines PHP is taking that and saying "okay, i need to execute this pathname as PHP" so yes, if it's not the same, you'll have issues. :p there's probably some other creative ways to mangle it per machine but for sanity you should keep things in sync anyway. a simple stack is a happy stack. On Mon, May 31,by mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
i know that typically the error is due to this not being defined right: fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME $document_root$fastcgi_script_name; are you sure that on the remote server that /data0/htdocs/www/forum/path/to/file.php exists? On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Mickie D <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > Sorry Mike lol > > Could it be that one server is running fpm and the oby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
your nginx's conf: include fcgi.conf; On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Mickie D <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > Hi Mike > > I do not have a fcgi.conf ? > > I have a spawn-fcgi > > /usr/bin/spawn-fcgi > > Thanks Mike > > Mick > > Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,92738,92787#msg-92787 > > > _____________________________by mike - Nginx Mailing List - English