In Apache this is the example: SSLCipherSuite ALL:-ADH:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:-LOW:-SSLv2:-EXP Is this it? ssl_ciphers ALL:-ADH:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:-LOW:-SSLv2:-EXP;by mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
I thought you could. Not that I ever thought it was a good enough idea to try or really recommend. :) I stand corrected then! On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:33 PM, 任晓磊<julyclyde@gmail.com> wrote: > NFS should not work. > the socket file is just a filename, not a pipe. > > 2009/7/1 Michael Shadle <mike503@gmail.com> >> >> php-fpm is webserver agnostby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Free hosted services are a bonus in my book. Besides, the contribution model probably works better with a git/bzr vs. an svn model. On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Chris Cortese<cortese.consulting@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm liking Git but I'm sure a lot of people are not ready to migrade from > SVN yet. > > Michael Shadle wrote: >> >> Right now it'sby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Right now it's one single large patch. I'm wondering if it makes sense to actually patch PHP, and take all the files that got patched and pull those out into a tarball. Then, instead of a patch, people can check out (or unpack a tarball) the files ON TOP of the PHP distribution files. By doing this, we can break up the patch into the individual files and get it into something like githby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
I noticed two things in my quick look at changes for php 5.3.0. These may have already been done or worked out in the cvs 5.3.0 fpm - but they were changes to the fastcgi SAPI which may lead to different behavior possibly. Although the more people who can use that version, it obviously compiles fine, now we need people with real production load, multiple pools, tcp ports and file sockets, tryby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Fuji<fujipadam@gmail.com> wrote: > 1) Is there any clear documentation on how to install php-fpm with > apache as the webserver and set the current user so I can get rid of > suphp? php-fpm is webserver agnostic. you can run it without a webserver on the machine (just remember to bind it to a tcp port so the other machines can talk to it...by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Well that's good. Compile passes. But we can't consider it gold without some true tests. Of which none are written so we can only rely on "me too" replies on the mailing list running it in production. I'm not even sure i can adopt it because some of the code I have to support is using deprecated functions or changed behaviors! Sent from my iPhone On Jun 29, 2009, at 5:5by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Not a problem. Anyone's contributions are valued. In theory if the patch applies cleanly, there hasn't been any changes to 5.3.0's FastCGI SAPI all that much then... I'm supposed to hear back from some actual PHP/PECL folks about next steps soon too. They may or may not have time or names of people who can help and other tips to keep this going and/or merge portions or all of it. On Mby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
I grabbed a copy of it. It kinda sucks - it would be good to know which areas need testing, both from functional and from stress testing before calling it production capable. We don't have any system like that in place nor do I know the right method to test how the FPM patch changes functionality necessarily... On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Martin<gpointorama@gmail.com> wrote:by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
If you can figure out how to get this into the patch itself I will be more than happy to post a sparc patch in the downloads area. On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Marcin Ochab<marcin.ochab@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was trying to get working php-fpm for php 5.2.8 on Solaris 9 Sparc > and I got error "unsupported processor. please write a patch and send > it to me"by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
My developer (who is out there somewhere) has been busy with some other stuff... I'm hoping he can come back and finish up the last bit I want to get done before releasing it into the wild.... Also if anyone knows C, nginx module coding or especially Kerberos/SPNEGO/GSSAPI, that would be great to have someone else review it, enhance it, etc. I actually got a quote from Sam who is the cby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
It hasn't been officially announced yet. But like last time you are probably just a couple hours ahead.. :) If anyone would like to work on getting the patch fixed up, I'm not sure if using the php 5.3 one from cvs (which is quite old) or just trying to get the 5.2.10 one working with it is a good place to start... I would love to have a patch out as soon as we can! On Mon, Jun 29by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
You can install from pecl manually (and I've had to in the past with apc anyway as it wants special configure options or else it fails) All the patches are up at http://php-fpm.org/downloads/ the 5.2.9 one says unofficial on it, FYI. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 28, 2009, at 11:51 PM, Chris Cortese <cortese.consulting@gmail.com > wrote: > > I'm already using php 5.2by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
I thought you had said iptables originally. Except according to your lsof output port 80 is in use by apache2... At least that's what I gandered unless that was 8080 and it's labeled as www. I'm on my phone right now so it's hard to go back and forth but check that quick (if I'm not wrong about 8080 being labeled www as well) Sent from my iPhone On Jun 28, 2009, at 1:49 PM,by mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
Here's a shot on the config file. http://php-fpm.org/Configuration_File On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Edho P Arief wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Michael Shadle wrote: > > Only help we need is > > a) funding > > b) C programming to keep it up to date and extend the features > > c) influence (getting it out there, making it important forby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Yeah, okay, I figured that. So you're proxying apache to nginx then? That's the wrong way to go! :) If I wasn't so lazy I would try 0.8.x on a box and see if I can reproduce. Either way though I wouldn't be able to fix it. Maxim or Igor would be able to locate it pretty quick I'm sure. IIRC Igor might be on vacation I think too. On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:56 AM, olefebvre wrote: >by mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
My worry isn't that it will become nonfunctional, just not 100% aligned. We should make sure the init script (well, it's not really an init script but a symlink to the php-fpm script) handles these signals and labels them correctly. On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Dai wrote: > > Hello Mike, > > I have added it to the list at , and with > detailed information at Wishlby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
lsof -i tcp:80lsof -i tcp:8080 On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 3:44 AM, olefebvre wrote: > My configuration is: > Apache listening on port 80, Iptables redirecting port 80 to port 8080, > Nginx listening on port 8080. > > I have been using Nginx with the same configuration for several months > (0.7.x and 0.8.x): > --conf-path=/etc/nginx/nginx.conf --error-log-path=/var/by mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
Well the site is open for editing - it is a wiki. I'm not sure if I've enabled normal users to create pages. I can create a new page for performance optimizations where people can post. I suppose some optimization tips that are outside of just standard php-fpm.conf is a good idea. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 27, 2009, at 2:08 PM, grigori <grigori.kochanov@gmail.com> wrote:by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
I think there's only a couple things we can document; a) How to compile it in for different architectures (if that's even needed? pretty much the same on most) b) the php-fpm.conf file itself. Which we can take a distro file, use the short explanation above each XML node, and grow it from there. I've created a stub page for that here: http://php-fpm.org/Configuration I'd add to it righby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Go ahead and add this to the wishlist (http://php-fpm.org/Wishlist) Does this follow the same pattern that nginx does? I think that was his original idea when he designed it. Either way if this change is made we'll need to make sure init scripts are updated too. On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Dai wrote: > > Hello, > > From the documentation, PHP-FPM handles signals as suby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Only help we need is a) funding b) C programming to keep it up to date and extend the features c) influence (getting it out there, making it important for PHP to include) On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Max Baryshnikov wrote: > > Thanks for the answer, Michael. > > BTW, I'm a long-term web-developer, so if you need any help with the > site, I will be glad to help. &gby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
setup a different pool for each one, give them a different tcp or unix socket location. then in your webserver, you point to the appropriate socket or tcp address. On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 1:24 AM, ktm wrote: > > Stupid question :), how do I know which user/group is serving which site > and how can i precisely "assign" user/group to a certain site. For example I >by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
I'm working both angles - either PECL or PHP. However, I don't think it can be done in PECL. It needs too many changes to PHP core. So there's 4 routes here: 1) PHP 100% 2) PHP changed enough so that a FPM PECL extension can exist and take advantage of the hooks in PHP 3) PECL only (don't think this is really an option) 4) It stays as a patch like today (probably not likely, it soundsby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
next step remove php-fpm.log restart php-fpm fresh once this issue occurs, can you pastebin that next? On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 1:26 AM, kabs wrote: > > mike here > > http://pastebin.com/m4908c2c9 > > Posted at Nginx Forum: > http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?3,2847,3409#msg-3409 > >by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
I have interest from 2 or 3 of the PHP developers who are in charge/work on the FastCGI SAPI. They've been wanting to merge PHP-FPM or portions of it into PHP for a while. Now they can, so I am keeping on them about it. Otherwise, I am trying to keep it fresh and up to date - the website is up now, each time there is a new PHP release (production, I don't want to waste time with RCs myselfby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Oops :) Now try. On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Lucian@lastdot.org wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:32 AM, Michael Shadle wrote: > > > > I took Andrei's copy and upgraded it. > > > > I think I've got most the spam off. It only allows registered users to > > edit. So if you want to edit, you need to register. > > > > http://php-fpmby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
I'd like macro support too Even if it's just for making the $document_root dynamic, which can be done but apparently does not affect the variable itself :( On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Jools Wills<buzz@exotica.org.uk> wrote: >> Is it is easy to use mod_macro in apache? You never really made that >> clear. > > Sorry. I wrote "is it" instead of &quoby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
I can't take much credit. It was the content that Andrei had posted on php-fpm.org originally, and had some help from "Till" I did go through and clean it up a little bit and try to change some grammar and some facts (like about the licensing for instance) and updated the changelog, etc. There are a couple pages that are protected, but otherwise, normal users should be able to edby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
I took Andrei's copy and upgraded it. I think I've got most the spam off. It only allows registered users to edit. So if you want to edit, you need to register. http://php-fpm.org/by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|