On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Antony Dovgal<tony@daylessday.org> wrote: > It's just much more convenient when you don't have to mess with patches or forks. > Also I feel more like contributing to PHP than some side-project. Well the expectation is they would receive a single package with the new features in it. Not a mishmash of patches and forks. Just the mainline stuff.by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
How does this look for a survey? http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=VTP29fjZm1s_2fYRFgodOHww_3d_3d Ideally we'd have one survey for each combination. I need to add quickly a question about many servers in deployment using PHP-FPM, and OS too. On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Michael Shadle<mike503@gmail.com> wrote: > You don't think there is any value in enhancing it in the meby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
You don't think there is any value in enhancing it in the meantime? There's some gaps that could be bridged ahead of time so when they are ready to accept it into the core, we'll have things like a reporting interface, adaptive process spawning, possibly even dynamic reconfiguration, and whatever else. I'd like to at least keep focus on the adaptive process spawning - that is the major lby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Mathew Davies<thepixeldeveloper@googlemail.com> wrote: > I think we need a continuous build procedure so when the latest version is > built, unit tests are ran and the results reported back. We also need > someone who can understand the code, because if a serious flaw shows up (it > can happen). Who's going to fix it? It'd be the end of PHPby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Money - funding for development (ongoing and future enhancements) Documentation (make sure it's up to date) Writing some sort of test cases so we can run automated tests on the patches to try to automatically find things ahead of time. Right now I do a compile, make test and then I throw some load at the server to see if it snaps. That's the best I've got. S Sent from my iPhoneby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
You can also use php-cgi -b $port with a combination of sudo and such and the right environment variables. That's what I was doing using ubuntu's upstart. Any supervisor should be able to do the same. I don't see any benefits from using spawn-fcgi since you still have to manage all the pools independently. What would give you more confidence in the project? Obviously the first stby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Download page: http://php-fpm.org/Download Direct link: http://php-fpm.org/downloads/php-5.3.0-fpm-0.5.12-rc.diff.gz It compiles flawlessly and I tried hammering my own local machine and things seem to work properly. However, there are a ton of PHP extensions and configurations out there, so test away. I was not able to try Suhosin with it as they don't have a patch out yet (at leastby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Gordon Pettey<petteyg359@gmail.com> wrote: > Check the browser. I've been having the same issue occasionally. I > think it is nginx, rather than php-fpm. Seems that the browser is > being told the file hasn't been modified, so the browser loads from > cache. <CTRL>+<F5> loads the fresh page for me. I'm used to this behavior andby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
No proxies in place. Only nginx (with no cache) and it seems to fix when I restart php-fpm. So i don't think the stack in front of php caching anything is the culprit unless it has some sort of etag or expires headers it was listening for. Either way then something is still not informing the system of a change. But I'm convinced something is going on with filesystem, shared memory,by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
All: If you're interested in this module, I am politely asking for some contributions towards it. I am going to probably ask one of the MIT Kerberos guys to do a quick scan over the code and tweak any Kerberos based stuff that could be optimized (he doesn't come cheap) and then possibly contract an nginx-capable developer to mature it from that side too. I've already put some funds in aby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
I think people have reported success with the one already up on the site that was done from a cvs version a long time ago. I will try to compare things though and "suggest" an official version pending real world testing. I'll label it a release candidate. That sounds appropriate. I'll try it on a home box (i can't run it on any other machines currently) Sent from my iPhby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Antony Dovgal<tony@daylessday.org> wrote: > Faster than that might be quite annoying for end users. > A SAPI is pretty critical part of PHP and upgrading PHP once a week is a lot of job, > even if you have only a couple of servers. Agreed. Although I would not consider it production, it would be like any project (the FPM portion) - with aby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Momchil Ivanov<slogster@gmail.com> wrote: > Are you using an opcode cacher? I forgot - no, I've disabled APC, that's the only opcode cache that I was using. I thought that was the culprit but it definitely wasn't.by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Antony Dovgal<tony@daylessday.org> wrote: >> I'm looking at it from the end-user perspective. How often do PHP RC's >> come out? > > Often enough, as I said, once in several months. I'm ready to get releases out faster than that if possible. As long as we have coders and funding to pay for whatever is needed to get things jump staby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
I am having an issue on two similar machines and a third one. Using both 5.2.8 and 5.2.9 I think. Might even be using 5.2.10 on one. I'll make a change to a script and the script doesn't take effect. I do a "service php-fpm restart" and boom - my changes are there. I've disabled nginx's fastcgi_cache (it's disabled by default) which shouldn't be the culprit but I've made sure ofby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Antony Dovgal<tony@daylessday.org> wrote: > You can change something in the core anytime you want (if it's not in a freeze, which happens quite rarely). Yes, but you have to wait for an RC at least for it to be rolled officially by the PHP team. > IMO bugfix releases are done in reasonable time (several months), so I don't see any reasons >by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Antony Dovgal<tony@daylessday.org> wrote: > > On 02.07.2009 21:54, Michael Shadle wrote: >> Yes, I'm looking at it from a two part angle. There's a management >> component - the config file and its syntax and telling PHP-FPM how to >> behave, and then the PHP core functionality, i.e. things like the >> request_execution_timby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
I'm afraid there's probably not many people who use that feature and it might be a feature that isn't implemented properly or has been tested. Someone who can examine the code might be able to understand it better but if it's running under chroot it depends on the exact implementation, but if it's running under chroot from the actual php engine perspective you might need some system librarby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
2009/7/2 Maxim Dounin <mdounin@mdounin.ru>: > Hello! > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 10:56:26AM -0700, Michael Shadle wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Maxim Dounin<mdounin@mdounin.ru> wrote: >> >> > 1. Which event method used? Make sure you use kqueue for *BSD, >> > epoll for Linux. >> >> Is epoll enabled by defauby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
That DEBUG idea is pretty neat. $document_root should work, but if you're using an aliased location or something else it will be different. On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Neves<marcos.neves@gmail.com> wrote: > > I change the parameter to a constant file like this: > fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME /qi/www/localhost/index.php; > and it works. So the problema wasby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Maxim Dounin<mdounin@mdounin.ru> wrote: > 1. Which event method used? Make sure you use kqueue for *BSD, > epoll for Linux. Is epoll enabled by default? Does it make sense to enable this for all servers, or only those with massive amounts of load?by mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Antony Dovgal<tony@daylessday.org> wrote: > Yes, major versions do take a long time to be stabilized. > But you don't have to wait for another major release to work on the manager code. > Also I don't see how you're going to get the patch into PHP and in > the same time keep a part out of it, is that what you meant? Yes, I'm looking at itby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
That's how I have mine setup. No need to hardcode the root in twice! Sent from my iPhone On Jul 2, 2009, at 3:05 AM, John Moore <grails@jmsd.co.uk> wrote: > Phillip Oldham wrote: >> John Moore wrote: >>> Michael Shadle wrote: >>>> Should be as simple as changing a php block and changing the >>>> extension to htm and passing it on to faby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
I would assume it would. It shouldn't change the behavior of php itself. Just the fastcgi sapi and a couple other "userland" functionalities. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 2, 2009, at 1:14 AM, Dmitry Medvedev <dmitry@fapu.ru> wrote: > > Can anyone confirm the new operator ":?" works with current unofficial > patch?by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Yeah. I'm awaiting a reply for the next steps from those guys. I've been in contact with all of them and they were happy to see the license change. One thing though that i personally think might be good is to keep the manager code out of php itself. That way additional features can be added at a faster pace than waiting around for a new php build (didn't they say 5.3 has been inby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Should be as simple as changing a php block and changing the extension to htm and passing it on to fastcgi like normal. I think. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 1, 2009, at 2:01 PM, John Moore <grails@jmsd.co.uk> wrote: > I know how to do this with Apache, not so sure with nginx. One one of > the websites I am hosting I want to use some PHP, but I don't want to > rename theby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
I pulled that from a default xml file that comes with php-fpm... if the user is using a default config file it will be 5s, i believe, but if they don't the internal default is 0s. i think in this case, the default xml config should match all the internal configurations (or vice versa, whichever makes more sense) On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Jason<jason.giedymin@gmail.com> wroby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
I was thinking github or launchpad. On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Jason<jason.giedymin@gmail.com> wrote: > > If the project lifeline is in jeopardy I would git than svn it. > Though you run the risk of distributed responsibility, read: no focus. > > On Jul 1, 3:59 pm, Michael Shadle <mike...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yeah, I'm working on determining if it'by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Yeah, I'm working on determining if it's worth getting the project source code hosted, etc... Kind of depends on the future of the project and PHP/PECL/etc. On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Jason<jason.giedymin@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey Thanks! > > Totally forgot about the .org. I was looking for a google code spot > for fpm. > > > > On Jul 1, 12:by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Jason<jason.giedymin@gmail.com> wrote: > - How do I start logging more detailed info with FPM? Honestly, "catch_workers_output" set to "yes" might help. Then errors may show up in your nginx error log or PHP error log. Also, "log_level" set to debug would probably help a lot. log_level is a global option, catch_workersby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|