i've used 125, 250, and 500. i think 500 is default typically. it just depends on your resources. basically figure out that engines * requests = how many requests your pool can handle before it will recycle, i believe. i don't think it will recycle individual children. or i'm completely confused right now (i'm at a conference with lagged wifi and i can't concentrate enough to examine thingby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
no error there. that's normal it's recycling the children. however, every 160 seconds is pretty quick. you could bump up the number of engines or how many max requests each one does. i'd probably bump both up. On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Ilan Berkner<iberkner@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Getting these errors in my php-fpm log on an on-going basis. Questions: &by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
you could try setting a windows environment variable though. might have to reboot before it will take global effect or ask the PHP list - someone on there should know. On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:12 AM, tdpaxton<nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > > I'm trying to set up nginx with PHP via FastCGI on a Windows server. Currently, I have 2 nginx worker processes and 1 php-cgi process.by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
use php-fpm or spawn-fcgi (if they work. i'm not sure if either will.) - welcome to "why would you host a site on windows?" day :) On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:12 AM, tdpaxton<nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > > I'm trying to set up nginx with PHP via FastCGI on a Windows server. Currently, I have 2 nginx worker processes and 1 php-cgi process. I have a test PHP file wby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
You only set it in your server block that is for SSL. If you use a shared block for both, I'm not sure; perhaps there could be if ($request_port = 80) { } type deal put in? On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Ilan Berkner<iberkner@gmail.com> wrote: > Some of our software relies on the $_SERVER['HTTPS'] PHP variable to be set > to "on" when accessing pages via https://.by mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
odd. a) i'd make sure the machine is fully updated b) what ./configure line are you using? c) did the PHP-FPM patch apply without any issues? d) have you applied any other patches or is this vanilla PHP 5.3.0 source? On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Willko Cheng<willko@foxmail.com> wrote: > > SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9 (i586) ,Linux linux 2.6.5-7.191-smp > pby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
what os/distro? you're using php 5.3.0 final, and the proper 5.3.0 patch off php-fpm.org? On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Willko Cheng<willko@foxmail.com> wrote: > Dear all: > > sapi/cgi/fpm/fpm_conf.o(.data+0xa8): In function `fpm_evaluate_full_path': > /root/php-5.3.0/sapi/cgi/fpm/fpm_conf.c:354: undefined reference to `fpm_conf_set_log_level' > sapi/cgby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Something else must be going on. I've ran xdebug without any issue with php-fpm. Check logs. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 8, 2009, at 12:55 PM, MikeG <mgatto@lisantra.com> wrote: > > Hi, I'm trying to use Xdebug in Eclipse PDT with php-fpm, but it times > out with no output. Is this because php-fpm is running as its own > fastcgi server? I run php-fpm on port 9999 wiby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
> I'd like to point out that it would be a nice idea to have the option > of specifying the config file in php-fpm.conf already on the wishlist. i'll add it to launchpad soon. it should be a very easy fix, something -i- might even be able to hack in :)by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Unless someone is available to patch it, I'd say use a normal compiler as that's not a configuration we could support right now. On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 7:50 PM, filebackup<nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > > Hi. Mike. > If I don't use php-fpm patch, I can compile php5.2.8 or php5.2.9 or php 5.2.10 with intel c++10. > > So I think the fpm_children.c file has issue. >by mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
What distro? Sounds like you're forcing the wrong compiler or you're missing the right one from your distro. It is written in c, not c++ just FYI. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 2, 2009, at 8:50 AM, "filebackup" <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > > When I make install php5.2.9 or php5.2.10 with intel c++10, it would > display the same error: > make: *** Erby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
Andrei came back from the dead quick and wound up getting some time to hack out PHP-FPM from being a patch into PHP. At the moment consider this untested, and I'm still working on getting more info up on launchpad etc. However, now all that is required is PHP sources to build against (which makes binary distribution of it very easy at least) - ideally i'd like to see it not require PHP sby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Valery Kholodkov<valery+nginxen@grid.net.ru> wrote: >> Isn't the number of replicas defined when you use mogadm/etc. to >> define a new domain? (I think replicas is a domain property) > > It seems to me that it is a property of a class. You're right. It's been a while since I've messed with mogilefs. :) I'm not sure how that mapby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Valery Kholodkov<valery+nginxen@grid.net.ru> wrote: >> Well, yeah, but then you have to make sure all your max_size's are >> bumped up etc (I assume) and that's one thing I wouldn't want to mess >> with continuously. > > I don't understand, sorry. What do you mean? PHP file upload sizes, post sizes, etc. However teamed up wiby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
Weird, last I heard there was no real difference between unix sockets and TCP/IP. Maybe I should be looking into that too?! What OS and version, distro, etc? What version of PHP? On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:10 PM, sumitg<nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > > I recently tried listening on unix sockets instead of IP sockets for a slow application I had, and saw that the performance (teby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
I got these kind of warnings with nginx too... So your /etc/security/limits.conf has the right stuff setup? The relevant line should be this inside of each "pool" section <value name="rlimit_files">1024</value> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:23 AM, wolfenstock<nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > > I am keep getting these type of errors even thouby mike - Php-fpm Mailing List - English
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Valery Kholodkov<valery+nginxen@grid.net.ru> wrote: > Well, the end user can upload directly to this as soon as it does via PUT request. Nginx already provides all necessary validations for PUT requests. Well, yeah, but then you have to make sure all your max_size's are bumped up etc (I assume) and that's one thing I wouldn't want to mess with conby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Valery Kholodkov<valery+nginxen@grid.net.ru> wrote: > No, at the moment it makes only one replica, but I plan to implement replication at desired minimal number of nodes simultaneously. Isn't the number of replicas defined when you use mogadm/etc. to define a new domain? (I think replicas is a domain property) It sounds like it is up to the clieby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
On Jul 27, 2009, at 11:21 PM, Valery Kholodkov <valery+nginxen@grid.net.ru > wrote: > > > Remember that you do PUT request, not a POST request. So there still needs to be some sort of handler between this and the end user, technically. Yes? I got confused and was thinking the end user could directly upload to this (hence asking about dynamic and variable things)by mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
Sent from my iPhone On Jul 27, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Valery Kholodkov <valery+nginxen@grid.net.ru > wrote: > Michael Shadle wrote: >> This doesn't put the file on the server you're communicating with >> right? > > Technically, it uses server you are communicating with as a temporary > storage and then creates a single replica on the first node providedby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
This doesn't put the file on the server you're communicating with right? It still uses the tracker to determine the proper node to store the file on right? Sent from my iPhone On Jul 27, 2009, at 10:51 PM, Valery Kholodkov <valery+nginxen@grid.net.ru > wrote: > Daniel wrote: >> Hi Valery, >> I just installed the module and recompiled nginx, set the configby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
Are there any limitations on file size? What's the largest you've tested with? Can the domain be an nginx $variable? Where does $mogilefs_path come from? Is that a field that comes from the upload form? Perhaps that negates the need for the last question then... Although it allows the client to mess with the post field and alter the location. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 27,by mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
Oh. You're right. It is server {} blocks already, not http {}. I don't know why I thought I had two different server blocks. 2009/7/27 Igor Sysoev <is@rambler-co.ru>: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 02:44:11PM -0700, Michael Shadle wrote: > >> Just for discussion sake why is that? I actually have the same >> instance of nginx with two separate http{} blocks. One for mogby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
Ah, so the module does all the work, instead of the client contacting the tracker, and the tracker using the nginx-based mogstored; this actually takes the file itself and pushes it into the mogilefs system for you? I suppose that's a pretty cool feature then. Anything to keep configuration light and usability the easiest. On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Valery Kholodkov<valery+nginby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
Just for discussion sake why is that? I actually have the same instance of nginx with two separate http{} blocks. One for mogstored and one for normal web serving. It might even be possible to have it under the same http block. I never looked into it that much. I guess explaining the pros and cons of doing it that way vs. Using the module would be good info to know. Sent from myby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
So this means this module now handles the DAV requests as well, so it can be a mogstored node? nginx technically already supported that :) However this could be more efficient, etc. I'm wondering if I am understanding this properly. On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Valery Kholodkov<valery+nginxen@grid.net.ru> wrote: > > Changes in version 1.0.2 (July 25 2009): > * Addby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
apt-get install build-essential not sure what else... nginx might -require- some other libs too. apt-cache search whatever will help you search for what you need On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Tom Keyser<tkeyser@emediavillage.com> wrote: > > Running > Linux version 2.6.26-1-486-vyatta (root@vyatta) (gcc version 4.2.3 (Debian > 4.2.3-2) > Its a Vyatta 5 firewby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
Sorry. I should have noted that. They come from our google gears based uploader which sends those headers although I believe it is standard headers for an app to send that should be dealing with content ranges and such. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 24, 2009, at 12:54 AM, Igor Sysoev <is@rambler-co.ru> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:24:19AM -0700, Michael Shadle wrote:by mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
There's a patch out for 5.3. I will probably be announcing the new version oh PHP-FPM soon, been waiting on Andrei's "okay" first in case he has some different code he'd like to start with; but it will no longer be a patch and can work standalone from PHP, so packaging it will be much easier :) On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:47 PM, meto<nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote: > You caby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
i think that 3 char signature is considered the "utf8 BOM" On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Marcin Operacz<marcin.operacz@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > We have some problems with server side including of UTF-8 files, can you > please confirm that this is impossible to make nginx include UTF-8 text > files (the ones that have 'ef bb bf' on the first 3 charsby mike - Nginx Mailing List - English
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|