Dear Listmember,

does anybody have started to patch the fpm sapi with the zend / php
functions?

I'am interested to give a try, if nobody have started ;-)

BR

Aleks

Hi,

2010/5/11 Aleksandar Lazic <al-phpfm@none.at>:
> Dear Listmember,
>
> does anybody have started to patch the fpm sapi with the zend / php
> functions?

what to you mean by the zend / php functions ?

>
> I'am interested to give a try, if nobody have started ;-)
>
> BR
>
> Aleks
>

On Die 11.05.2010 22:56, Jérôme Loyet wrote:
>Hi,
>
>2010/5/11 Aleksandar Lazic <al-phpfm@none.at>:
>> Dear Listmember,
>>
>> does anybody have started to patch the fpm sapi with the zend / php
>> functions?
>
>what to you mean by the zend / php functions ?

I mean:

e*alloc vs malloc
_array* vs fpm_arrays
zend_str_* vs fpm_str

and so on.


BR

Aleks

On 13.05.2010 00:18, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> e*alloc vs malloc

e*malloc() is used where possible.
If it's not used, it's done intentionally.

> _array* vs fpm_arrays

_array? I have no idea what you mean.
Zvals are definitely not applicable in this case.

> zend_str_* vs fpm_str

There is no such type - fpm_str.
And zend_str doesn't exist either.
Zvals cannot be used here, too.


What was the initial reason for your question?

--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal
---
http://pinba.org - realtime statistics for PHP

On Don 13.05.2010 00:23, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>On 13.05.2010 00:18, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> e*alloc vs malloc
>
>e*malloc() is used where possible.
>If it's not used, it's done intentionally.
>
>> _array* vs fpm_arrays
>
>_array? I have no idea what you mean.
>Zvals are definitely not applicable in this case.
>
>> zend_str_* vs fpm_str
>
>There is no such type - fpm_str.
>And zend_str doesn't exist either.
>Zvals cannot be used here, too.

Ah ok, I was not sure if it's possible to use it.

>What was the initial reason for your question?

To 'integrate' the fpm more deeper into the zend and php framework if
this was not done already ;-)

Aleks