On 02/25/2010 05:09 AM, agentzh wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Brian Long<brian@dotspots.com> wrote:
>
>> I might have just figured out the answer to my own question. It looks like
>> setting v->no_cacheable = 0 is what was required.
>>
> Yeah, I believe that's what you need :) Please also test it in the
> context of subrequests ;)
>
And in the context of multiple worker processes.

Marcus.

_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel