Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Potential bug in ngx_event.c

Rian Hunter
September 02, 2019 12:50PM
On 2019-09-02 09:24, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> My bad, you are right here.
>
> This isn't a problem though, as accept mutex does not use
> sem_wait(), but only uses ngx_shmtx_trylock() - that is, only
> atomic operations.
>
> And for other mutexes we allocate ngx_shmtx_t structures from
> shared memory, so it works fine.

Got it, very much appreciate the effort looking into this and following
up. Cheers!
_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
Subject Author Views Posted

Potential bug in ngx_event.c

Rian Hunter 87 August 23, 2019 02:02PM

Re: Potential bug in ngx_event.c

Maxim Dounin 15 August 30, 2019 10:20AM

Re: Potential bug in ngx_event.c

Rian Hunter 16 August 30, 2019 09:28PM

Re: Potential bug in ngx_event.c

Maxim Dounin 16 August 31, 2019 02:30PM

Re: Potential bug in ngx_event.c

Rian Hunter 18 September 01, 2019 02:46PM

Re: Potential bug in ngx_event.c

Maxim Dounin 15 September 02, 2019 12:24PM

Re: Potential bug in ngx_event.c

Rian Hunter 19 September 02, 2019 12:50PM



Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 78
Record Number of Users: 6 on February 13, 2018
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready