Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: SO_REUSEPORT

November 24, 2015 05:40PM
Ok,

I have found it to be a configuration bug. With a fresh configuration
(default configuration from package, with reuseport added) and reuseport
enabled the feature works (same 3.18 kernel, same nginx binary).

Now I just need to identify which line of our production configuration
creates this bug.

I will update when I know more.

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Valentin V. Bartenev <vbart@nginx.com>
wrote:

> On Wednesday 25 November 2015 00:25:19 SplitIce wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I couldn't find anything in the mailing list about this issue, surely we
> > are not the only one?
> >
> > When activating reuseport I am seeing all requests be served from a
> single
> > nginx process. All others are just idling (SIGALARM interruption of
> > epoll_wait / epoll_wait timeout according to strace).
> >
> > Process 442 attached - interrupt to quit
> > epoll_wait(60, 8225010, 512, 4294967295) = -1 EINTR (Interrupted system
> > call)
> > --- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) @ 0 (0) ---
> > rt_sigreturn(0xe) = -1 EINTR (Interrupted system
> call)
> > epoll_wait(60, 8225010, 512, 4294967295) = -1 EINTR (Interrupted system
> > call)
> > --- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) @ 0 (0) ---
> >
> >
> >
> > This only occurs with reuseport, as soon as it is disabled the load is
> > correctly distributed again.
> >
> > Configuration:
> > worker_processes 12; # 2x8 cores on server
> > multiple server blocks on different IP's and ports with reuseaddr.
> > Linux kernel: 3.18.20
> >
> > Server nic has interrupts over all cores:
> >
> > # sudo ethtool -S eth0 |grep rx | grep pack
> > rx_packets: 11244443305
> > rx_queue_0_packets: 1381842455
> > rx_queue_1_packets: 1373383493
> > rx_queue_2_packets: 1490287703
> > rx_queue_3_packets: 1440591930
> > rx_queue_4_packets: 1378550073
> > rx_queue_5_packets: 1373473609
> > rx_queue_6_packets: 1437806438
> >
> >
> > We have also experimented with disabling iptables and anything else on
> the
> > server that could be interfering. I have also loaded it onto three other
> > fresh servers with the same kernel (same OS image), but with different
> nic
> > cards (with and without multiple rx queues) with no changes.
> >
> > This has me stumped. Ideas?
> >
>
> You should try another kernel.
>
> wbr, Valentin V. Bartenev
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx-devel mailing list
> nginx-devel@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
>
_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
Subject Author Views Posted

SO_REUSEPORT

splitice 501 November 24, 2015 08:26AM

Re: SO_REUSEPORT

Valentin V. Bartenev 202 November 24, 2015 08:44AM

Re: SO_REUSEPORT

splitice 312 November 24, 2015 09:02AM

Re: SO_REUSEPORT

splitice 311 November 24, 2015 09:04AM

Re: SO_REUSEPORT

splitice 314 November 24, 2015 05:40PM

Re: SO_REUSEPORT

splitice 358 November 24, 2015 05:46PM

Re: SO_REUSEPORT

Maxim Dounin 233 November 25, 2015 08:18AM



Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 80
Record Number of Users: 6 on February 13, 2018
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready