Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Use Test::Nginx with etcproxy and/or valgrind (Was Re: Test::Nginx::LWP vs. Test::Nginx::Socket)

agentzh
March 02, 2011 10:50PM
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Antoine BONAVITA
<antoine_bonavita@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Following agentzh tips, I'm moving the test cases for my module to Test::Nginx
> (instead of using my python unit tests).
>

There's a lot of undocumented features in Test::Nginx::Socket. I'm
sorry. I'd like to document a bit how to integrate it with etcproxy
and/or valgrind here because it's so useful ;)

Use Test::Nginx::Socket with etcproxy
============================

Test::Nginx automatically starts an nginx instance (from the PATH env)
rooted at t/servroot/ and the default config template makes this nginx
instance listen on the port 1984 by default.

The default settings in etcproxy [1] makes this small TCP proxy split
the TCP packets into bytes and introduce 1ms latency among them.

There's usually various TCP chains that we can put etcproxy into, for example

Test::Nginx <=> nginx
----------------------------

$ ./etcproxy 1234 1984

Here we tell etcproxy to listen on port 1234 and to delegate all the
TCP traffic to the port 1984, the default port that Test::Nginx makes
nginx listen to.

And then we tell Test::Nginx to test against the port 1234, where
etcproxy listens on, rather than the port 1984 that nginx directly
listens on:

$ TEST_NGINX_CLIENT_PORT=1234 prove -r t/

Then the TCP chain now looks like this:

Test::Nginx <=> etcproxy (1234) <=> nginx (1984)

So etcproxy can effectively emulate extreme network conditions and
exercise "unusual" code paths in your nginx server by your tests.

In practice, *tons* of weird bugs can be captured by this setting.
Even ourselves didn't expect that this simple approach is so
effective.

nginx <=> memcached
-----------------------------

We first start the memcached server daemon on port 11211:

memcached -p 11211 -vv

and then we another etcproxy instance to listen on port 11984 like this

$ ./etcproxy 11984 11211

Then we tell our t/foo.t test script to connect to 11984 rather than 11211:

# foo.t
use Test::Nginx::Socket;
repeat_each(1);
plan tests => 2 * repeat_each() * blocks();
$ENV{TEST_NGINX_MEMCACHED_PORT} ||= 11211; # make this env take a
default value
run_tests();

__DATA__

=== TEST 1: sanity
--- config
location /foo {
set $memc_cmd set;
set $memc_key foo;
set $memc_value bar;
memc_pass 127.0.0.1:$TEST_NGINX_MEMCACHED_PORT;
}
--- request
GET /foo
--- response_body_like: STORED

The Test::Nginx library will automatically expand the special macro
"$TEST_NGINX_MEMCACHED_PORT" to the environment with the same name.
You can define your own $TEST_NGINX_BLAH_BLAH_PORT macros as long as
its prefix is TEST_NGINX_ and all in upper case letters.

And now we can run your test script against the etcproxy port 11984:

TEST_NGINX_MEMCACHED_PORT=11984 prove t/foo.t

Then the TCP chains look like this:

Test::Nginx <=> nginx (1984) <=> etcproxy (11984) <=> memcached (11211)

If TEST_NGINX_MEMCACHED_PORT is not set, then it will take the default
value 11211, which is what we want when there's no etcproxy
configured:

Test::Nginx <=> nginx (1984) <=> memcached (11211)

This approach also works for proxied mysql and postgres traffic.
Please see the live test suite of ngx_drizzle and ngx_postgres for
more details.

Usually we set both TEST_NGINX_CLIENT_PORT and
TEST_NGINX_MEMCACHED_PORT (and etc) at the same time, effectively
yielding the following chain:

Test::Nginx <=> etcproxy (1234) <=> nginx (1984) <=> etcproxy
(11984) <=> memcached (11211)

as long as you run two separate etcproxy instances in two separate terminals.

It's easy to verify if the traffic actually goes through your etcproxy
server. Just check if the terminal running etcproxy emits outputs. By
default, etcproxy always dump out the incoming and outgoing data to
stdout/stderr.

Use Test::Nginx::Socket with valgrind memcheck
====================================

Test::Nginx has integrated support for valgrind [2] even though by
default it does not bother running it with the tests because valgrind
will significantly slow down the test sutie.

First ensure that your valgrind executable visible in your PATH env.
And then run your test suite with the TEST_NGINX_USE_VALGRIND env set
to true:

TEST_NGINX_USE_VALGRIND=1 prove -r t

If you see false alarms, you do have a chance to skip them by defining
a ./valgrind.suppress file at the root of your module source tree, as
in

https://github.com/chaoslawful/drizzle-nginx-module/blob/master/valgrind.suppress

This is the suppression file for ngx_drizzle. Test::Nginx will
automatically use it to start nginx with valgrind memcheck if this
file does exist at the expected location.

If you do see a lot of "Connection refused" errors while running the
tests this way, then you probably have a slow machine (or a very busy
one) that the default waiting time is not sufficient for valgrind to
start. You can define the sleep time to a larger value by setting the
TEST_NGINX_SLEEP env:

TEST_NGINX_SLEEP=1 prove -r t

The time unit used here is "second". The default sleep setting just
fits my ThinkPad (Core2Duo T9600).

Applying the no-pool patch to your nginx core is recommended while
running nginx with valgrind:

https://github.com/shrimp/no-pool-nginx

The nginx memory pool can prevent valgrind from spotting lots of
invalid memory reads/writes as well as certain double-free errors. We
did find a lot more memory issues in many of our modules when we first
introduced the no-pool patch in practice ;)

There's also more advanced features in Test::Nginx that have never
documented. I'd like to write more about them in the near future ;)

Cheers,
-agentzh

References

[1] etcproxy: https://github.com/chaoslawful/etcproxy
[2] valgrind: http://valgrind.org/

_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
Subject Author Views Posted

Use Test::Nginx with etcproxy and/or valgrind (Was Re: Test::Nginx::LWP vs. Test::Nginx::Socket)

agentzh 2667 March 02, 2011 10:50PM

Re: Use Test::Nginx with etcproxy and/or valgrind (Was Re: Test::Nginx::LWP vs. Test::Nginx::Socket)

Antoine BONAVITA 785 March 03, 2011 08:58AM

Re: Fw: Use Test::Nginx with etcproxy and/or valgrind (Was Re: Test::Nginx::LWP vs. Test::Nginx::Socket)

Antoine Bonavita (personal) 752 March 15, 2011 11:14AM

Re: Fw: Use Test::Nginx with etcproxy and/or valgrind (Was Re: Test::Nginx::LWP vs. Test::Nginx::Socket)

agentzh 602 March 16, 2011 02:50AM

Re: Fw: Use Test::Nginx with etcproxy and/or valgrind (Was Re: Test::Nginx::LWP vs. Test::Nginx::Socket)

agentzh 585 March 16, 2011 03:08AM

Re: Fw: Use Test::Nginx with etcproxy and/or valgrind (Was Re: Test::Nginx::LWP vs. Test::Nginx::Socket)

Antoine Bonavita (personal) 623 March 16, 2011 05:40AM

Re: Fw: Use Test::Nginx with etcproxy and/or valgrind (Was Re: Test::Nginx::LWP vs. Test::Nginx::Socket)

agentzh 629 March 16, 2011 11:44PM

Re: Fw: Use Test::Nginx with etcproxy and/or valgrind (Was Re: Test::Nginx::LWP vs. Test::Nginx::Socket)

Antoine Bonavita 721 March 17, 2011 04:54PM

Re: Fw: Use Test::Nginx with etcproxy and/or valgrind (Was Re: Test::Nginx::LWP vs. Test::Nginx::Socket)

agentzh 773 March 17, 2011 11:36PM



Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 87
Record Number of Users: 6 on February 13, 2018
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready