April 07, 2009 01:18PM
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Larry Bates <larry.bates@vitalesafe.com> wrote:
> I do something like this but solved it a completely different way.  I put
> storage behind the balanced servers and shared it among them using NFS.  That
> way every server sees a consistent set of files.  Otherwise users get "nailed"
> to a server and that sort of defeats the purpose of load balancing.  Hope this
> helps.
>
> -Larry

yeah this is probably the traditional way, i do it this way as well.

nfs can be annoying though; i would suggest using freebsd, netapp or a
solaris based server instance if possible. nfs on linux is notoriously
weak.
Subject Author Posted

using the upstream_hash_module and handling changes when adding new servers

jackdempsey April 07, 2009 11:44AM

RE: using the upstream_hash_module and handling changes when adding new servers

lbates35406 April 07, 2009 12:17PM

Re: using the upstream_hash_module and handling changes when adding new servers

mike April 07, 2009 01:18PM

Re: using the upstream_hash_module and handling changes when adding new servers

jackdempsey April 07, 2009 01:54PM

Re: using the upstream_hash_module and handling changes when adding new servers

Cliff Wells April 07, 2009 01:59PM

Re: using the upstream_hash_module and handling changes when adding new servers

mike April 07, 2009 02:16PM

Re: using the upstream_hash_module and handling changes when adding new servers

Cliff Wells April 07, 2009 03:32PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 185
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready