Thank you! I will do some research now and maybe get even better
performance!


-----Original Message-----
From: Jérôme Loyet [mailto:jerome@loyet.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 4:15 PM
To: nginx@nginx.org
Subject: Re: nCache, Varnish Performance

2010/1/28 AMP Admin <admin@ampprod.com>:
> Is xCache something different all together?  I know it's for caching php
but
> is it recommended to use nCache, proxy_cache, or Varnish if you're already
> using xCahce?

definitely ! xcache cache only PHP opcodes. PHP code is still executed
for each page. front end caches (proxy_pass, ncache, ...) makes
dynamic requests (php) into static ones (files). It's all different
and complementary.

++ Jerome

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Piotr Sikora [mailto:piotr.sikora@frickle.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 4:01 PM
> To: nginx@nginx.org
> Subject: Re: nCache, Varnish Performance
>
> Hi,
>
>> Is nCache and Varnish far better than proxy_cache?
>
> >From http://code.google.com/p/ncache/:
> "NCache is now in nginx core , you can use it as nginx proxy cache."
>
> I don't use Varnish, but I'm pretty sure it isn't _far_ better.
> But the answer really depends on your exact use-case.
>
> Best regards,
> Piotr Sikora < piotr.sikora@frickle.com >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>

_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx


_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx