On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 01:03:39AM +0100, J?r?me Loyet wrote:

> >> hi,
> >>
> >> in 0.7.44 the auth_basic_user_file directive doesn"t seem to work
> >> using relative path.
> >>
> >> here is the part of the conf I used for testing.
> >>
> >> location /c {
> >> auth_basic "Authentication required";
> >> auth_basic_user_file users.db;
> >> }
> >>
> >> location /d {
> >> auth_basic "Authentication required";
> >> auth_basic_user_file conf/users.db;
> >> }
> >>
> >> location /e {
> >> auth_basic "Authentication required";
> >> auth_basic_user_file /usr/local/nginx/conf/users.db;
> >> }
> >>
> >> Everything has been compiled all by default.
> >> Here is debug lines I have with each case
> >>
> >> /c
> >> 2009/03/26 23:19:28 [error] 12347#0: *1 open() "users.db" failed (2:
> >> No such file or directory), client: 127.0.0.1, server: localhost,
> >> request: "GET /c HTTP/1.1", host: "localhost:89"
> >>
> >> /d
> >> 2009/03/26 23:19:54 [error] 12347#0: *2 open() "conf/users.db" failed
> >> (2: No such file or directory), client: 127.0.0.1, server: localhost,
> >> request: "GET /d HTTP/1.1", host: "localhost:89"
> >>
> >> /e
> >> 2009/03/26 23:21:01 [debug] 12357#0: *1 rc: 0 user: "toto" salt: "btO5GKhJaEtBQ"
> >> 2009/03/26 23:21:01 [debug] 12357#0: *1 post access phase: 8
> >> 2009/03/26 23:21:01 [debug] 12357#0: *1 content phase: 9
> >> 2009/03/26 23:21:01 [debug] 12357#0: *1 content phase: 10
> >> 2009/03/26 23:21:01 [debug] 12357#0: *1 content phase: 11
> >> 2009/03/26 23:21:01 [debug] 12357#0: *1 http filename: "/usr/local/nginx/html/e"
> >>
> >> I'll dig into :)
> >>
> >
> > it seems there is a bug in the function ngx_http_compile_complex_value
> > of src/http/ngx_http_script.c.
> >
> > --- src/http/ngx_http_script.c.orig 2009-03-27 00:53:18.000000000 +0100
> > +++ src/http/ngx_http_script.c 2009-03-27 00:53:33.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@
> > }
> >
> > if (nv == 0 && nc == 0) {
> > + ccv->complex_value->value = *v;
> > return NGX_OK;
> > }
> >
> > it works for auth_basic_user_file but I didn't yet try other
> > directives or functions which can rely on this function. What do you
> > think ?
> >
>
> or maybe more that:
>
> --- src/http/ngx_http_script.c.orig 2009-03-27 00:53:18.000000000 +0100
> +++ src/http/ngx_http_script.c 2009-03-27 01:03:05.000000000 +0100
> @@ -118,10 +118,6 @@
> return NGX_ERROR;
> }
>
> - ccv->complex_value->value = *v;
> - ccv->complex_value->flushes = NULL;
> - ccv->complex_value->lengths = NULL;
> - ccv->complex_value->values = NULL;
>
> nv = 0;
> nc = 0;
> @@ -147,6 +143,11 @@
> ccv->root_prefix = 0;
> }
>
> + ccv->complex_value->value = *v;
> + ccv->complex_value->flushes = NULL;
> + ccv->complex_value->lengths = NULL;
> + ccv->complex_value->values = NULL;
> +
> if (nv == 0 && nc == 0) {
> return NGX_OK;
> }
>
> don't know :)

Yes, thank you, the second patch is better.


--
Igor Sysoev
http://sysoev.ru/en/