+1 for 0.7.* to be stable
> It should be easy to test. Define fastcgi_param SERVER_ADDR as a constant (say your real IP) in your fastcgi_params file and see what's passed in phpinfo.
>
> BTW, a similar bug appeared before and I pulled my hair out over it. Igor did subsequently fix it in 0.7.20. It's in the changelog.
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mike <mike503@gmail.com>
>
> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:26:10
> To: <nginx@sysoev.ru>
> Subject: Re: nginx-0.7.42
>
>
> i would think it's nginx's fastcgi, not php's fastcgi.
>
> nginx's told to fastcgi_param SERVER_ADDR the same, and the version of
> nginx changed, nothing else - PHP didn't, etc. so the problem from
> that angle is localized to something on the nginx side.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Merlin <merlin@mahalo.com> wrote:
>
>> I would guess that it will be stable when Igor releases 0.8.x.
>>
>> However, did PHP fastcgi recently break? I am referring to the incorrect
>> server name as 0.0.0.0 - maybe it isn't broken, just saying, perhaps
>> possible issues like this is why. Also, more importantly, new features have
>> been introduced that are still going through iterations (the try_files
>> directive, specifically). Generally, this is what staves off
>> "stable-ness". This is why debian packages are so old in the stable branch,
>> btw - they do not update package versions or add new packages except for
>> security concerns - this is what makes it stable (rarely changing), as
>> opposed to volatile (often changing) system.
>>
>> That said, many of us use the development branch in production, as really a
>> recompile of the binary is no problem when you can switch the processes with
>> zero downtime :). NginX is one of the better programs out there to have on
>> the cutting edge; Igore is from what I've seen very careful in what he adds
>> or changes and it always seems to be improving, with fewer bugs being
>> introduced than fixed (which is awesome!).
>>
>> - Merlin
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Walter Cruz <walter.php@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> good catch.
>>>
>>> Why 0.7 is not considered stable?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 2:16 PM, mike <mike503@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> How about when it will be deemed stable (been running it fine ever
>>>> since I decided to use nginx ...) and consider 0.6.x legacy instead?
>>>> :)
>>>>
>>>> 2009/3/17 Athan Dimoy <foxx@freemail.gr>:
>>>>
>>>>> Any idea when 0.7xx new features will be backported to stable tree
>>>>> (0.6)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> []'
>>> - Walter
>>> waltercruz.com
>>>
>>
>
>