All files from this thread

File Name File Size   Posted by Date  
smime.p7s 3.5 KB open | download j94305 09/03/2019 Read message
smime.p7s 3.5 KB open | download j94305 09/04/2019 Read message
J. Lewis Muir
September 04, 2019 12:32PM
On 09/04, Jürgen Wagner (DVT) wrote:
> This is the effect you get by having the HTTP equivalent of a symbolic link
> in the NGINX (visible to the browser), not in the file system (which is
> opaque to users). The file system link will (over time) serve different
> contents under the same URL, so in fact, addressing changes with every
> deployment. The suggested approach keeps URL addressing constant and just
> changes the entry pointer on a new deployment.
>
> I agree that this is not the solution that first comes to ones mind, but it
> does solve a number of nasty versioning issues we have run into over time.
> Your mileage may vary :-)

Thank you for the further explanation! Indeed it seems like a
compelling solution!

What about web search engine indexing; do you do anything to avoid
search engines indexing the versioned URLs? I suppose that if you only
publish the unversioned entry-point URLs, search engines will respect
that? (Maybe wishful thinking.) Or will they follow a 307 redirect and
index those URLs?

For example, it would seem undesirable to do a web search for "my-app"
and get a list of, say, the "index.php" for each version (e.g.,
"/my-app/releases/1.0.0/index.php", "/my-app/releases/1.0.1/index.php",
"/my-app/releases/1.0.2/index.php", etc.).

So, perhaps you use a "/robots.txt" to exclude "/my-app/releases/"?

DuckDuckGo seems to respect "/robots.txt" for controlling what gets indexed

https://help.duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/duckduckbot/

But Google says "/robots.txt" is not for keeping a web page out of their
index

https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6062608

and that you should use a "noindex" directive instead.

So maybe you use both a "/robots.txt" and the robots meta tag with
content="noindex" in the served resources or perhaps "X-Robots-Tag:
noindex" in the HTTP header response?

Regards,

Lewis
_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Subject Author Posted

Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

J. Lewis Muir August 30, 2019 01:34PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

J. Lewis Muir August 30, 2019 02:22PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

J. Lewis Muir August 30, 2019 02:38PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

J. Lewis Muir August 30, 2019 03:00PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

Francis Daly August 30, 2019 04:56PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

J. Lewis Muir August 30, 2019 06:00PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

Francis Daly August 30, 2019 07:22PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

Francis Daly August 31, 2019 03:28AM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

J. Lewis Muir August 31, 2019 11:06AM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

J. Lewis Muir August 31, 2019 10:12AM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

Francis Daly August 31, 2019 04:52PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

J. Lewis Muir August 31, 2019 05:56PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

Francis Daly September 02, 2019 05:04PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

J. Lewis Muir September 03, 2019 01:28PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

J. Lewis Muir September 03, 2019 05:32PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

Ian Hobson August 30, 2019 03:02PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

J. Lewis Muir August 31, 2019 11:32AM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

Francis Daly August 30, 2019 04:34PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

gariac August 30, 2019 05:24PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

Ian Hobson August 31, 2019 10:42AM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

j94305 August 30, 2019 06:28PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

gariac August 31, 2019 03:20PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

J. Lewis Muir September 03, 2019 11:30PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x? Attachments

j94305 September 03, 2019 11:56PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

J. Lewis Muir September 04, 2019 11:30AM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x? Attachments

j94305 September 04, 2019 11:44AM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

J. Lewis Muir September 04, 2019 12:32PM

Re: Allow internal redirect to URI x, but deny external request for x?

j94305 September 10, 2019 02:46PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 176
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 500 on July 15, 2024
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready